![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/881dc672-1a6f-417f-a18a-84763e525b41.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
I use it when I’m traveling and am on insecure WiFi.
However, it doesn’t let you pick your egress location,.so if you’re trying to get to PornHub in Texas, it won’t help.
I use it when I’m traveling and am on insecure WiFi.
However, it doesn’t let you pick your egress location,.so if you’re trying to get to PornHub in Texas, it won’t help.
Again, you’re putting words in my mouth. I’m done engaging with you as I don’t think you’re conversing in good faith.
No one said anything is beneath senior employees.
It’s a lost opportunity when you, a staff engineer, spend your time doing something that a junior engineer could do – instead of doing a task a junior engineer can’t do.
It’s faulty, short-sighted logic though. If every company trained juniors, only for them to jump ship in two years, there’d be a pool of trained juniors to hire from. Yes you wouldn’t get your investment out of that particular person, but you’d be hiring someone else’s investment.
Beyond that, there’s work that is better suited to more junior employees because it’s literally a waste of the senior employees’ skills.
Too many industries are shitting on entry level employees now… They’re easy targets for layoffs and easy targets for AI, apparently. Now they’re already complaining about the lack of quality talent.
If you don’t invest in the next set of entry-level employees, you won’t have the next set of qualified employees.
What is missing is that the podcast originally claimed it was entirely written and generated by AI. They only changed the story when they were sued.
And I don’t think any of their nude photos are appropriate for academic papers (unrelated to nudity research) either?
Yeah. The arbitration section of the agreement specifically says it only applies to US residents.
Your entire comment reads as a refute of OPs criticism and an excuse for Meta’s actions. If you were agreeing with OPs criticism, you would typically use phrases like “only five years”.
And? Why take active steps to stop it from working instead of just stopping technical support? Oh yeah, to get more money.
Strong names are great, but (sometimes) mentioning the type of variable in the name is redundant.
Appreciate you giving credit where credit is due. It is 100% corporate greed.
I’m more concerned that the company decided it was OK to meld the “From:” line of her email (asking for support) into her profile. If they think that’s an appropriate way to handle PII, I don’t trust them.
I hate patent trolls, but I will say “it couldn’t have happened to a nicer company”. I hope they both go broke on legal fees.
Misread that as “cat” and thought I was in for a cute satire, not a boring dystopia.
Not at all! I had to use ID.me for unemployment and it skeeved me out too.
They’re working to improve login.gov to support the level of user verification needed for this service, but it isn’t there yet. Hopefully next year when tax time rolls around again.
deleted by creator
It should be illegal to use an AI in the hiring process that can’t explain its decisions accurately. There’s too much of a risk of bias in training data to empower a black box system. ChatGPT can lie, so anything powered by it is out.
I switched all my domains to Porkbun. No way I’m hanging out in Squarespace land.