First of all, stop using word “expat” when you’re talking of immigrants but from “better countries”

Put “never gonna give you up” playing on background every time they leave their PC unlocked

Majority of United States citizens are now verifiably fascist

<3

Do what you want 'cause a pirate is free

So you’re saying pymixxedveggies is bloated?

Pot calling kettle black or something

Trump is not responsible for his security though, secret service is. Would think that those guys would know to not wear random trackers with them

And in my next trick I’ll teleport Palestinians to their early grave

Meanwhile in osrs team they have open communication with the community, new content is released only if accepted by vast majority of players, no mtx or other major enshittification of games, the developers clearly very much care of the game and want to keep it running.

You can’t say that for vast majority of the game developers

Didn’t the NK nuclear program start already in the 50s with the help of USSR?

Technically, you shouldn’t even deploy certs to network appliances or servers but they should fetch certificates automatically from a vault. I know there’s minimal support for such things right now from some vendors, but that should be fixed by those vendors.

Even Microsoft supports such solutions in Azure both with PaaS components and Windows and Linux servers (in Azure or onprem) via extensions

Finnish as well (kaksois-v)

Oh, Hitler wasn’t dumb, just evil to the core. Trump is dumb as the left foot boot AND evil to the core.

Edit: I guess I was wrong

I think asklemmy is more like “what do you guys think” and nostupidquestions is for “how do bumblebees fly when they’re so fat”

Yeah “legitimate interest” seem to be abused a lot

Copypasting here answer to similar question in superuser.com

https://superuser.com/a/1624773

Under GDPR there are 6 grounds based on which anybody can process personal data. Those are:

• Consent

  You explicitly agreeing to it. This needs to be opt-in, informed, specific and freely given, but also gives the greatest freedom to a company.

• Contract

  This is the basis which raj’s answer confused with legitimate interests. This is the processing that is required to fulfil a contractual obligation (note that contracts do not always need to be signed, e.g. an order from an eshop).

  need to process someone’s personal data:

  • to deliver a contractual service to them; or
  • because they have asked you to do something before entering into a contract (eg provide a quote).

  Source: ico.org.uk

• Legal obligation

• Vital interests

• Public task

• Legitimate interests

  Legitimate interests are the most flexible lawful basis for processing personal data. In the words of the UK’s ICO 1:

  It is likely to be most appropriate where you use people’s data in ways they would reasonably expect and which have a minimal privacy impact, or where there is a compelling justification for the processing.

  Source: ico.org.uk (worth reading!!!)

  The underlying text from the GDPR itself (definitions and links added are mine)

  processing is necessary for the purposes [=a specific minimal type of processing] of the legitimate interests pursued by the controller [=the company wanting to process your data] or by a third party except where such interests are overridden by the interests or fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subject [=you] which require protection of personal data, in particular where the data subject is a child.

  Source: GDPR Article 6(1f)

  So basically a legitimate interest claim by a company is them saying ‘we are convinced that our interest outweigh the negligible impact on the privacy of the people whose data we process’. This doesn’t give them a free pass though, as GDPR also gives the right to object

  The data subject shall have the right to object, on grounds relating to his or her particular situation, at any time to processing of personal data concerning him or her which is based on point [public interest] or [legitimate interest] of Article 6(1), including profiling based on those provisions.

  Source: GDPR Article 21(1)

  Which then require the company to either concede and stop the processing or justify their claim. Companies in practise have taken this to mean they can basically just do a bunch of processing and as long as they make the objection process (=opt-out) easy enough the theory is that they will get away with it.

Notes:

1 The UK left the EU, but they still have by far the best English language resource explaining GDPR and for the time being “UK GDPR” matches “EU GDPR” one on one as far as I am aware

Oldschool Runescape

Didn’t grindr have recently some shit that they were selling the confidential user data forward?

That’s for testing engines alone. Static fire is separate yes way further down the line when you have the rocket built and ready to fly