deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Article didn’t mention Brave either. I think it’s also blocked because Reddit is only allowing Google to scrap its website.
There are easier ways to check. Here is how i did it (no way there hasn’t been a trump reddit post in a week)
Also, rate limiting. A publicly accessible website doesn’t mean that it will allow scrapers to read millions of pages each week. They can easily identify and block scrapers because of the pattern of their activity. I don’t know if Reddit has rate-limiting, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they implement one.
I got you https://archive.ph/GS2I0
Old indexed results are fine. But anything from last week is not showing up
Duckduckgo uses Bing for links.
from : https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/sources/
tbh I’ve never seen a Lemmy link when searching for stuff. Is it too small to show up? Or do search engines not index Lemmy instances?
That’s like saying Russian propaganda is okay because US army did a terrorist attack in Iraq. Propaganda is bad even if it’s directed at a “bad” country or whatever
This is not world news. This is a propaganda opinion article. Which shouldn’t appear on world news community.
Additionally, Mondoweiss.net is just anti-israel propaganda site: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/mondoweiss/ . That’s their whole shtick. Don’t believe what they say about Israel in the same way you shouldn’t believe what russian RT says about how the west is falling
Data source: WIkipedia??? Wikipedia is not a source ffs
wtf is this journalism??? one guy on twitter said that so now its confirmed. Just tried it and works fine. Do people just upvote this because they hate Elon Musk and want this to be true?
deleted by creator
That’s really cool
99% was referring to them not being both tech savy and extremely privacy conscious. I don’t disagree that the appeal of Firefox is better privacy. I just don’t think the average user is looking to absolutely remove every drop of data collected. I mean just look at the default Firefox homepage it comes with. It has sponsored shortcuts and sponsored stories. They put them there because the average user actually clicks on them. If everyone was privacy conscious like you say, they would turn off the feature and Firefox wouldn’t keep it because they don’t make money from it. But that’s obviously not the case.
I mean it might not be the most performant. But I’ve build with React and it made it easier to build projects quickly. Regardless, my point wasn’t about React and if it’s good or bad. My point was that Meta can build a framework that’s not about collecting data. Sometimes they have other motives.
Here I think the reason they are co-authoring this is to try to paralyze Google’s hold on personalized ads and user data. And probably reduce scrutiny of their data collecting actions in the sense that their new data collecting will be based on PPA if it goes mainstream.
Interesting, I didn’t know that. I just remember my country being at the bottom that’s why I said it that way.
I just looked it up, Corruption Perceptions Index: https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2023 places most corrupt at the bottom. But I think you are right because corruption ranking should have the most corrupt on the top. I.e you are 1st at corruption
Super welcoming community here. Disagree with them they immediately want you out. Anyways, React is not a programming language, it’s a framework built on Javascript. My point was that hating on anything Meta built is stupid because they can build ok things
Meta bad!!! Wait until you realise that React is built by Meta. Are you gonna stop using websites that is built on React?
Mondoweiss is literal propaganda tho