Are you really sure? 😂
WHAT? Where is the next one planned to take place?
Not really. People in developed countries need to divide their emissions by approximately ten times. Every little bit helps. And we should start with the easy ones.
They are obvious because they are rarely irreplaceable. We can live without mass tourism and fast deliveries.
And yet they are part of the obvious low hanging fruit for reducing emissions
I don’t understand why they keep targeting art. Wouldn’t smashing car windows (for example!) make more sense?
Never seen that banner or an ad. I guess it’s just a matter of time though 😕
Another example of a multi-billion dollar company that doesn’t curate their products/services. Costs too much money they would only profit 234 billion instead of 244 billion.
In the long term it’s a terrible strategy. People will lose confidence and stop shopping there. I’ve almost stopped and I know I’m not the only one.
Not that most executives care about long term…
What makes the problem hard is that there are a lot of dickheads on both sides, not just the governments. You can be an oppressed victim AND a dick. These things are not mutually exclusive, unfortunately.
So this is the “moderate republican”. Good to know…
Per fuel/mile/cargo, aircraft are actually very efficient
Not really : https://ourworldindata.org/travel-carbon-footprint
Getting rid of these fees means they will be displayed in the overall cost, which might in turn reduce the number of people flying.
30€ flights (that you end up paying more due to these hidden costs) are definitely part of the problem.
Christianity has evangelicals but also Quakers
Which one is supposed to be liberal?
I wonder if the older sister could have served as a surrogate mother instead? It’s not the same of course, but it could be a lighter weight alternative to this heavy surgery…
I’m willing to bet a team of untrained, uneducated, software/data engineers receiving big salaries are responsible for this.
I’d be willing to bet that they’ve outsourced to India instead.
This is big news. It will have repercussions on the way big pension funds invest their money, which in turn will affect interest rates, share prices, etc. In the long run, this is definitely going to have real-world repercussions, even if it’s hard to see exactly what right now.
I don’t understand why they don’t use a second model to detect falsehoods instead of trying to fix it in the original LLM?
Well, this should give them some motivation.