…you have my condolences
…you have my condolences
Yep, being familiar with the data model is 98% of the effort.
The remaining 2% is the query
The first thing I noticed. I was confused, thinking maybe they had an old XP machine lying around to plug in after the main one failed, but then I read further and it was just a stunt
Hybrids: the worst of both worlds.
If you want to keep relying on gasoline then just buy an ICE car
It’s like rebrands.
Most rebrands occur because the average marketing person is pretty average and “rebrand” looks good on your CV.
A couple of million later, half way through, customers hate the new brand and the marketing people who started it have already left for greener pastures
Redesigning a perfectly good design that everyone is used to allows you to put “designed Netflix user interface” on your CV, and since management has to spend a ton of money on it, suddenly your team is worth something
I disagree unless the tests are reasonably high level.
Half the time the thing you’re testing is so poorly defined that the only way to tighten that definition is to iterate.
In this sense, you’re wasting time writing tests until you’ve iterated enough to have something worth testing.
At that point, a couple of regression tests offer the biggest bang for buck so you can sanity check things are still working when you move on to another function and forget all about this one
Is this a typo? I’m sure lemmy.nz has been around longer than yesterday
Thanks Dave, you’re doing an awesome job.
I feel like a traitor as a kiwi that joined lemmy.world instead of lemmy.nz (I was part of one of the early Reddit exodus’s and didn’t know any better) but thanks to federation I don’t feel like I’m missing out on anything
Well, we have one group of people saying “the treaty means this”. And we have another group of people saying “no, the treaty means this”.
Which group is right? Currently it’s impossible to tell, because they’ve interpreted parts of the treaty in different ways. And there is some precedent in case law thanks to Waitangi tribunal rulings.
Clarifying the principles removes the ambiguity and makes it clear for everyone.
I understand the opposition though, Maori stand to lose a bunch of Maori-specific things they fought long and hard for if it’s decided that actually all citizens of New Zealand have the same rights and duties under NZ law
MSSQL in Microsoft* cases
FTFY although arguably Microsoft and Stupid and synonyms
Yeah I figured that was the case.
It’s an interesting thing about federation between platforms - everything gets federated, even the platform-specific stuff that may be irrelevant elsewhere
Reluctant upvote because it’s New Zealand but my dude/dudette, what’s with all the hashtags?
I’m assuming a federated post from Mastodon
If you’re American and you’ve been eating the food-like product labelled as “Cheese” in your supermarkets then Yes
To be fair it’s probably running on Windows.
All the servers force-restarted due to windows updates, but the update introduced an issue and now the Bing API service won’t start
Keeping shit running on Windows is always going to be a gamble
There’s a rule banning “self-preferencing.” That’s when platforms push their often inferior, in-house products and hide superior products made by their rivals
Wow, I can see Microsoft fighting this one tooth and nail. It’s basically their whole business model
Wow, and here I was trying to set breakpoints using the devtools debugger and faffing around with sourcemaps.
Wish I knew about this 10 years ago!
Let’s say your country was about to be invaded, your house stolen and you sent elsewhere or killed so that citizens of the invading country could occupy your house and your land instead.
And all of that not happening was hinged on the physical prowess of an old guy who’s probably been in politics for decades.
How helpless would you feel?
It just wasn’t well written. Pretty pictures can only take a mediocre story so far
Why would I avoid politics on the politics platform?
And then managers go “why does shadow IT exist?”