He didn’t say he needed to make money farming.
He didn’t say he needed to make money farming.
Are Parity Flags legal in Florida?
Lower hood bonnet height. So victims get thrown on the hood with a better chance of survival. With a high hood height, people are more likely to get knocked down and run over.
If you use the AWS load balancer product or their certificates, they have access to the private key, regardless of whether you forward traffic from the LB to the container over HTTPS or not.
If you terminate the SSL with your own certificate yourself, Amazon still installs the SSM agent by default on Linux boxes. That runs as root and they control it.
If you disable the SSM agent and terminate SSL within Linux boxes you control at AWS, then I don’t think they can access inside your host as long as you are using encrypted EBS volumes encrypted with your key.
With what? HTTPS has to terminate the encryption somewhere and that place has to have the private key to do so.
CloudFlare is providing the same service here as all other hosts of HTTPS websites do.
It’s not who issues the cert that matters, it is who hosts it. Hosting it includes having the private key. You always have to trust your website host, full stop.
One of the services they provide is free SSL certificates. As part of that, they have the private key to decrypt the traffic. They aren’t trying to hide that— this is true of any service that hosts the SSL cert for your site.
Some hunger strikes have been effective. Others not.
They don’t necessarily end in death.
They are willing to die for a cause they believe in.
We are all going to die. Some of us will take a stand for something that matters to us.
Wow. Sounds like she wasn’t helping herself or her cause.
Has someone ever tossed your lunch out?
Humans have been doing mass killings have been happening long before there was mass tracking.
It will be interesting if other journalists can fact check this as true.
Don’t piss off the small phone fans at the DOJ.
I have been reading NYT’s coverage of this conflict. Their journalists seem to have a range of viewpoints and their coverage reflects that.
Here’s a story that’s just about the level of Pro-Palestian support:
Here: “Invading Gaza Now is a Mistake”
The conflict has proved hard to cover because journalists have been targeted and killed, so there are a shortage of journalists on the ground in Gaza.
I’ve also appreciated the times when NYT has published follow-up pieces to explain when I found case where their own reporting didn’t meet their own high standards and what they are doing about it.
I agree we should hold them to a high standard, we should have a conversation about media literacy and be careful what we consume.
Regarding a possible NYT ban, I think it is both important to consider their totality of coverage behold what is seen as specific mistakes. Also consider the alternatives. What English language outlets have objectively better and less biased coverage of the conflict?
They already have a phone holder in their car pointed at their face.
Also, the background in car shots is pretty neutral, while the background in your house might be more revealing or distracting.
Google: trust us, we can’t see your VPN traffic. Most users: No.