Yes. They’re both incredibly efficient.
Yes. They’re both incredibly efficient.
You see, at some point you need a shield around the reactor to actually absorb all the high energy particles released, and turn that energy into heat.
So we have to replace a few tons of shielding that’s lightly radioactive every 2-6 years. That’s literally a vehicle’s worth of waste to power tens of thousands of homes.
Because retaliation on behalf of domestic businesses is something Europe freaking invented.
We’ve already paid for it though. That’s why we built Yucca Mountain.
Also nuclear fusion has essentially zero waste.
deleted by creator
Is the EU just going to bet that none of its companies ever have to do business outside of the EU?
Oh ya, it’s time for Hot Xi Summer.
Ya force them to use unguided artillery shells! /s
Honestly, because of the EPA regulations, it’s difficult and expensive to make the small trucks that were so popular in the 1980s and 1990s. Tesla could have cleaned up with a simple single-cab electric truck (especially if it came with fleet purchase options). Because of the economics of the situation if it were priced in the 25-35k range it would fly off the manufacturing lines and become the new standard workhorse for local businesses (think plumbers going out to 5-6 calls a day and then charging overnight), plus it would have the added benefit of a “bring your generator to the worksite” stuff.
They’d just have to be willing to strip a lot of the fancy electronic stuff out for manual things (like manual doors, environmental controls etc…).
The headline makes it sound like Israel attacked the aid. That’s not the case according to the body of the article. Odd.
Probably the latter. Almost nothing that sucked today sucked less 20, 40, 60, 80 etc… years ago. They almost universally sucked more. We’re just more aware.
For example, cops have always been beating black people; but that wasn’t common knowledge for most until recently.
Ahh fair enough. Hope you have a great day.
Not just for a sociopath. Anti-air is expensive (table with some options. A patriot cost like $3M/pop. If a missile was going to hit an uninhabited area choosing not to intercept makes sense.
That’s why DARPA keeps working on DEWs.
It’s a reasonable question to ask.
Yes we killed en-mass back then.
The primary feature of LLM’s is the hallucination.
LLM’s hallucinate all the time. The hallucination is the feature. Depending on how you design the neural network you can get an AI that doesn’t hallucinate. LLM’s have to do that, because they’re mimicking human speech patterns and predicting one of my possible responses.
A model that tries to predict locations of people likely wouldn’t work like that.
I would fully disagree. We targeted civilians, not in war zones at functions like weddings, funerals and other explicitly civilian gatherings. We (the US) had the intent to kill civilians, and our tolerances for civilian casualties were an order of magnitude larger than what the IDF is using.
If anything it’s not comparable because what we did was worse.
Then we chuck it in that mountain we carved out.