• 0 Posts
  • 15 Comments
Joined 8 days ago
cake
Cake day: February 14th, 2025

help-circle
  • Plenty of answers here but I don’t think anyone has answered this part:

    Surely they would have a much easier time pushing their rhetoric and establishing their agenda by keeping a purposeful distance from that sort of indefensible imagery and symbolism.

    So here’s my take …

    Musk did the sig heil as a fuck you to everyone that doesn’t like him. That’s it.

    They just won the election by basically lying, ignoring, and playing for time. They can literally do whatever the fuck they like for the next n years with impunity.

    Imagine if Harris had won and in her victory speech said something like “Don’t worry Don, I’ll make sure they give you diapers in jail.” It would’ve been a low blow but we would’ve loved her for it because it’s poking fun at the conservatives for no other reason than to stir them up.

    I think there’s another, longer conversation to be had about why racism (and by extension nazism) resonates with voters in 2025, but I’m too weary for that I think.






  • There’s a number of problems with this.

    It would only work if enough communities and instances adhered rigidly to similar editorial decisions about what is “political”. I don’t think that’s achievable.

    Mods would have to do the heavy lifting in tagging/ untangling things.

    It’s not going to be as simple to implement as you think.

    Posts are already categorised by community. You can block the vast majority of political posts by blocking a few communities and users.

    At times if filtered out keywords like Musk and Trump. You don’t really need to implement a feature for this. Just get posters to include a tag in the title of their post.

    Looking at your other comments, you’re not going to be deterred by these criticisms, so my suggestion would be to find the git repo and create an issue to get some proper feedback from other contributors.





  • My global political history isn’t great, and maybe others can correct me here, but it doesn’t feel like the US has had much of a stabilising effect in the last 30 years.

    There’s plenty of conflicts that just don’t make the news that the US just isn’t interested in. Poor places with no oil or other resources. Presently Burma comes to mind. There always seems to be somewhere in Africa, last decade there was genocide in Congo IIRC.

    Also it’s not really clear whether their involvement in the middle east over the last few decades was positive or negative.

    It’s nice to have them hovering around South China Sea to keep China in check I guess.