• 0 Posts
  • 21 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 31st, 2023

help-circle













  • I’m not so sure. The study discusses specifically people who engage in partisan subreddits, which is not the same as being politically engaged. It also uses an AI to grade toxicity, which surely mischaracterizes many interactions.

    For example, I have been in communities of a non-political nature, where political discussions occur. These are often about real issues that affect real people in the community, and yet there are people complaining about political content.

    To complain about political content is, at best, a very privileged take, demonstrating that you are in a position where politics do not affect you much. At worst, it is actively hostile behavior with the goal of continuing the status quo and shutting down discourse. I would call most of these kinds of comments “toxic”, and yet the rhetoric is usually fine, so I doubt an AI would agree.






  • paholg@lemm.eetoProgrammer Humor@lemmy.mlProc macro sandboxing
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    I personally don’t think they do, but an argument can certainly be made. Rust proc macros can run arbitrary code at compile time. Build scripts can also do this.

    This means, adding a dependency in Cargo.toml is often enough for that dependency to run arbitrary code (as rust-analyzer will likely immediately compile it).

    In practice, I don’t think this is much worse than a dependency being able to run arbitrary code at runtime, but some people clearly do.