Oh no that’s Piracy. That’s what these guys would say. They want to think you own the media but also you are not free to do what you want with it. Weird kind of ownership.
TFO Winder
Oh no that’s Piracy. That’s what these guys would say. They want to think you own the media but also you are not free to do what you want with it. Weird kind of ownership.
We are officially round the circle.
From cable tv with ad breaks to streaming ad-free and back to streaming with ad breaks.
What did they do ? I thought all processor are following standards hence I am running Linux on my Intel or AMD CPU.
And I can repair when it breaks.
Most of their population is living hand to mouth.
I don’t think they care slightest about climate change.
Or broke their screens
It was unquestionable.
The opposition in India is at rock bottom historically.
Yes just like cortona, Microsoft account and other shit.
It’s not on by default… Yet
What’s this?
I think it’s free.
If something allows it then it’s morally justified. You can’t be naked intentionally and ask me to not look at same time.
Because it’s trying not to be Android
This is more like tech politics
This is really bad.
Had a front end dev who didn’t use adblocker.
Here are some lines from article.
The Fediverse will soon have power on the social web to shape its future, but only through and in the interaction with Meta. This is the reality the Fediverse has to start arranging itself with
it will shape the web in the next couple of years and that means, it would be a good idea to study it. At first, it could look like an unfair battle, but in fact, Meta has some weaknesses as well just as the Fediverse has some advantages.
Also: Meta is playing for time: the Copernican revolution of the social progresses merciless, and they can only somewhat control the consequences of this. At the same time, the open Fediverse will also have to be willing for this indirect coalition with Meta and if they will do that is nowhere near certain.
What a load of crap
I see nothing wrong in this.
Android is open source platform, you don’t need Google for Android.
Android gives you a base system so that you don’t have to reinvent the wheel while creating an operating system. All phone manufacturers build on Android to create OS for their mobile.
Googles monopoly is because a lot of things we benifit from Android is cross compatibility of devices from different companies which is facilitated by Google - Play Store, Etc.
This monopoly of Google is not forced but domination of it in Android space since the very beginning.
Anyone can create an OS without Google services but it would be very less useful compared to Android with Google services, because of lack of compatibility.
Whats so terrible about lemmygrad.