Remember that cache goes stale
Remember that cache goes stale
They could create an autonomous oblast in the Russian far east for them…
Better remove it.
Why would he not pay somebody to play?
The bigger story is:
Who are those 343,011 idiots?
All refs load into ChRome.
Yes, let AI execute all business processes as designed.
Reposting my question from the other post:
Can lemmy become the place on the internet to discover the best accounts on X and thus become popular?
Iran was complicit even though the United States has no intelligence or evidence
Is there no racism in the army that he isn’t worried that the statement looks too close to general Powell’s speech about WMD?
He most likely is right but the similarity is unfortunate.
When lemmy becomes popular, how will we make the solid information stand out and not drown in disinformation ourselves?
Can we pull off an elite move and use the war to make lemmy popular right now by being the place on the internet that has the best collection of relevant and trustworthy X accounts?
To me, the more interesting questions are ‘why?’ and ‘what?’
Why are they so bad? What keeps them down and how can it be turned around?
As if slavery is a new concept and nobody was warned about huge conglomerates in every science fiction movie.
if you know that someone is immortal, then why are you trusting that they’re going to care about your relationship with them?
You meant immoral, didn’t you?
Good question both ways.
I am convinced that reading will be replaced with computers generating videos. Apart from that, I agree.
I was all with you until the forced education. Nothing kills curiosity faster. We can do better. There are enough humans that not everybody has to read, especially in a world of phones and videos.
The important part is respect. Children need an environment that nurtures it so that they are respectful as adults. A bit like ‘do not abuse a child and it won’t become an abusive adult.’
But yes, we don’t have full agency. That’s where development is needed.
I agree with your intentions. The integrity of a victim mustn’t be questioned. The issue to me is that it is not logical that attributing any blame does shift all responsibility. If that is the case then the victim is still in an abusive situation and priorities shouldn’t lie on the usage of language.
Thank you for sharing your experience. I hope that you are in a safe environment. I am overextending my position a bit and claim that despite your experience we shouldn’t accept limited agency in humans. For one, I have just been arguing that democracy relies on it. Apart from that, the aggressors can also claim limited agency. To me, that is not acceptable. Agency is a lie that we accept for the law to work. There are no aliens who take care of us. We have to make do with what we have.
That said, I am of course open to concepts about how to structure society with limited agency.
That depends on the housing market. If you have a surplus in housing, rent will remain stable because tenants will move if their landlord increases rent.
If you have a deficit in housing and more people look for a place to stay than there are available places, then tenants cannot move. Landlords and other businesses in deficit markets like healthcare will take all additional income.
Is this a choice of words issue? Saying that somebody could have prevented something and with that knowledge should prevent it next time doesn’t change victimhood for me. The suffering of the victim remains.
What is lost if the victim had some agency? Is there some metaphysical aspect to it? Are victims prechosen by fate and it’s a sacrilege to question their fate?
I can agree that a zebra being killed by lions shouldn’t be blamed. But a person who ignores advice from friends and joines a multilevel marketing scheme is not entirely innocent.
But not the one you need. When she notices a smell it’s already too late.