![](https://media.kbin.social/media/35/ba/35ba09bfd2c35a44c0c418396a5404a5a92084a918fd5f67ec42ce6ef8c36eb6.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/2QNz7bkA1V.png)
Fair. The rest of the site is a lot more normal. More being a relative term, of course.
Great American humorist. C# developer. Open source enthusiast.
XMPP: [email protected]
Mastodon: [email protected]
Blog: jordanwages.com
Fair. The rest of the site is a lot more normal. More being a relative term, of course.
And hundreds of thousands of years of evolution pre-training the base model that their experience was layered on top of.
That’s never stopped us before.
For all his faults, Donald uniquely has the charisma to pull this act off. His children are all rizzless goofs. My personal feeling is that anyone trying to do “The Trump” will fail miserably. What we’re more likely to see is someone else come along with a different style but that’s also charismatic.
There is a disproportionate amount of wealth concentrated in the older generation and those who will inherit it will probably be even worse with that money than the last generation.
Don’t worry, this isn’t going to happen. Inheritance, I mean. Almost all of that generations wealth is going to be eaten by elder care. At $10k per month, and zero of that being covered by Medicare until you’re basically destitute, nursing homes are going to demolish that store of wealth and their descendants will be left with nothing.
Tomato, tomato, as far as they’re concerned.
Judging by the crash test videos of the Cybertruck, this does not surprise me in the least. Why make cars safe when you could just not save some money?
This has amused me. Thank you for the amusement.
You’re right, but what would the internet be without a little pedantry and ignoring the point of the post? :D
Wikipedia just summarizes the primary sources.
Technically, I think they only allow primary sources to be referenced if supported by a secondary source. They have weird and complex rules around that,
Come on man, use some critical thinking and context here. He clearly is not saying that cars some kind of an issue here. He was making an idle point about traffic jams in the US with hurricane evacuations and how that doesn’t apply in this situation. He’s not even making a value judgement on anything here.
And the article is making the case explicitly that this is bad. He is saying that 9/11 brought about terrible actions from us and that we should learn lessons and not repeat our mistakes. He’s actually trying to convince the reader that we should not “swallow” another genocide.
You keep describing it as jingoistic and the author didn’t claim or even appear to be heavily nationalistic and in fact appeared quite the opposite.
…did you read the post? It feels like you did not read the content of the post.
If GM thinks they have the rizz that Tesla has/had they are absolutely insane.
When I was purchasing my car about 6 years ago I was sure I was going to for for a Nissan, as I currently had one that I loved. But they didn’t offer any cars with Android Auto support and that was a deal breaker. It is a make or break thing for me, and I suspect as more and more people adopt it, it will be for them too. We might see this kind of pressure delayed, as car purchases don’t happen every year for most people, and the CarPlay/Android Auto software has really only become quality must-have software within the past few years. Yet, as people approach the time to purchase a new car, I believe the pressure on automakers to integrate these technologies will intensify.
Yeah, lol. Who could have seen that coming?
I guess Microsoft.
What makes you think that?