• HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    You are also having people with a wrong understanding of the Chinese property crisis by trying to map it to the American Great Recession, when the two problems are very different.

    For instance, Evergrande is a real estate developer, not a bank. Evergrande going broke is like if Toll Brothers went broke in the USA. It would be bad, but it isn’t the end of the financial world.

    Second, China doesn’t have the mortgage industry that the USA does. China has mortgages, but a large part of the market is owned as investments. You also have to pay a lot more as a down payment compared to the USA. So, the exposure that the Chinese banking industry has to this is a lot less than what happened in the USA in 2007/8. However, this means that people are more at risk in losing money on their real estate.

    Third, while housing in the USA is an investment that some people take, there are generally other ways Americans invest their money to save for retirement. In China, a greater percentage of the population saves for retirement by buying property. Given China’s demographic issues, this can be a problem if a lot of retirees lose a significant part of their nest eggs.

    Fourth, municipalities and provinces can’t set their own taxes and the national government hasn’t been giving them enough money to pay for services. Local revenue generation has been handled through real estate development. There has not been a plan released yet to handle the loss of revenue or dealing with municipal debt. National plans for real estate development are removing the profit incentive, so how does that impact local budgets?

    Some of these points are covered in your article. However, even in this thread, the discussions seem to be trying to view China’s property crisis through an American lens when the mechanics behind both are very different.

    • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sure, I completely agree with everything you have said. And the sad reality of news right now in the English speaking world has a US bias for obvious reasons. My link to a S.Korean paper is still a link to a US ally. They’re not as biased as USA itself, but won’t escape all influences. It’s unfortunate at best.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, but I feel like you would get biases from Chinese sources as well. This property crisis seems to be the worst economic crisis that China has dealt with for a generation and the party has seemed to lean more on the mandate of heaven justification for them to stay in power.

        And a government dealing with a loss of legitimacy during a financial crisis isn’t just a Chinese issue, but it appears to be something that current Chinese leadership has no experience in handling given their decades of economic growth.

        So I would expect Chinese sources to paint a rosier picture of the crisis, focusing on punishing the greedy developers while trying to stifle discussions on reforming the municipal tax bases or the role of local officials being a key part in property overdevelopment.

        • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Absolutely, it’s incredibly annoying everyone has a bias. But that’s what we are going to see as the world splits into 2. In many ways it’s inevitable. I’m just appreciative that at least for now, both sides seem to be opposed to war, with distressingly USA seemingly more likely to start it. Since historically when you have 2 superpowers, war is the first thing that they used to do.