• Noughmad@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is debated whether it was necessary, but the position that it was wrong is self-contradictory.

    It assumes that the atomic bombs were not a huge factor in the decision to surrender, as they would surrender anyway due to conventional warfare (US bombing and USSR attacking and removing the best negotiating venue for a conditional surrender). Which might be true. But, at the same time it assumes that the nuclear bombs were somehow worse than the conventional bombing that has been going on. So the atomic bombs had to be both ineffectual and hugely damaging at the same time.