phaedrux_pharo@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoI'd rather have a "Would you like to hide all Sports related Content?" button than a "Would you like to hide all NSFW content?" buttonmessage-squaremessage-square317fedilinkarrow-up12.3Karrow-down1140
arrow-up12.16Karrow-down1message-squareI'd rather have a "Would you like to hide all Sports related Content?" button than a "Would you like to hide all NSFW content?" buttonphaedrux_pharo@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square317fedilink
minus-squareScrollone@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up29arrow-down7·1 year agoEspecially US politics. I couldn’t care less. Or as some Americans say, “I could care less”
minus-squarenuez_jr@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoIt’d take effort to care any less than I currently do. And I don’t care enough to reduce my interest any further.
minus-squarePyro@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down6·1 year agoFor any passing Americans who are thinking “what’s the difference?”, please take 3 minutes to find out.
minus-squareaidan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·1 year agoThe purpose of language is to communicate, if it is understood by the target audience it is correct.
minus-squareSpliffman1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down5·edit-21 year agodeleted by creator
minus-squareaidan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·1 year agoBecause language evolves and isn’t prescriptivist. Especially in the US where a Founding Father wrote a dictionary to explicitly reject strict prescriptivism(it was still prescriptivist in ways but better than contemporaries).
minus-squarewheeldawg@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoThis is not an example of evolution, this is just a widespread error.
minus-squareaidan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoThe target understands it, therefore it is correct language
minus-squareSpliffman1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·edit-21 year agodeleted by creator
minus-squareaidan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agothe argument is about america??
minus-squareaidan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYeah. It is about why Americans say it- so it is relevant to American history?
minus-squareaidan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoWhy does it matter if the target audience understands it?
Especially US politics. I couldn’t care less.
Or as some Americans say, “I could care less”
It’d take effort to care any less than I currently do. And I don’t care enough to reduce my interest any further.
For any passing Americans who are thinking “what’s the difference?”, please take 3 minutes to find out.
The purpose of language is to communicate, if it is understood by the target audience it is correct.
deleted by creator
Because language evolves and isn’t prescriptivist. Especially in the US where a Founding Father wrote a dictionary to explicitly reject strict prescriptivism(it was still prescriptivist in ways but better than contemporaries).
This is not an example of evolution, this is just a widespread error.
The target understands it, therefore it is correct language
deleted by creator
the argument is about america??
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Yeah. It is about why Americans say it- so it is relevant to American history?
deleted by creator
Webster wouldn’t have cared
deleted by creator
Why does it matter if the target audience understands it?