I’m not normally a chicken wing eater, but I hear about others liking them. Thought I’d get some at the store the other day, but they were $3.99 a pound while drumsticks were only $1.99 a pound.

For you chicken wing enthusiasts - why would chicken wings be worth the $2 more a pound? What are you doing with them? Talk me out of the drumsticks I bought instead.

  • NuMetalAlchemist@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    They were a garbage cut of meat that were tossed to the freed slaves of the south, and as black folk do, they turned it into a delicious snack with spices and seasonings. As culture desegregated, it became a trendy dish and that drove the prices up on what was once a trash cut.

    • HYPERBOLE_TRAIN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      From a culinary viewpoint, the ratio of protein, fat and crispy skin is perfect and you won’t find it elsewhere on a chicken. The large surface area to relatively small amount of edible meat means a high ratio of seasoning per bite.

      Makes for a tasty snack

  • wilberfan@lemmy.film
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve never had them, but my guess is that they’re essentially a sauce-delivery system?

  • Infinitenonblondes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In the two weeks before the superbowl the local news will start talking about ancillary things like what people eat in the cities who’s teams made the superbowl that you can serve at a superbowl party. In the early ‘90s Buffalo made the superbowl 4 years in a row, and thus the Buffalo wing gained national notoriety.

  • degrix@lemmy.hqueue.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re not. They used to be the cheapest cut of chicken because most places would just toss them out. As buffalo wings became more popular people have been consuming them more driving up the price. They taste good, but they’re definitely not priced well at 3.99 a pound. I would expect them to be on par with the cost of chicken breasts.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Have you even seen chicken breast prices lately? I’d expect wings to be around the same price as the drumsticks.

      • pitninja@lemmy.pit.ninja
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Legitimately asking because I never buy breasts, are they wicked expensive right now? Breasts are the worst part of the chicken for anything other than the total amount of meat IMHO because they don’t have as much flavor and dry out really easily when they’re only slightly overcooked. My order of preference is thighs>legs>wings>breasts.

          • pitninja@lemmy.pit.ninja
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Honestly thighs, legs, and wings for me are on pretty even footing depending on what I’m doing for a meal. At places that do whole chickens and not wings specifically, I generally prefer the order I listed. But wings from places that specialize in wings are really great. Whole breasts are just undeniably over by themselves as my least favorite way to eat chicken (even though I don’t dislike them or anything, I just don’t prefer them).

  • anolemmi@lemmi.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I suppose it has to do with surface area. You could toss your drumsticks in buffalo sauce, but there’s a couple problems. It would be way messier and you’d end up with even more sauce on your face, and ultimately there’s more meat to surface in a drumstick so you’d end up with less sauce in each bite, including plenty of chicken closer to the bone with no sauce at all.

    So-

    1. Convenience
    2. Maximum sauce
  • Leviathan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    They used to be thrown away or used for stock, poor people turned them into trendy food and now it’s expensive. Same with Osso bucco.

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    They are good bar food, used to be cheap leftover chicken parts, lots of crispy skin and sauce, easy to cook with a deep fryer, slower to eat, and goes well with beer.

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Very tender meat you get to eat off the bone, plus lots of crispy skin.

    disclaimer: I don’t like wings either

  • cabbagee@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would buy the drumsticks too at that price. If you’re not looking for the historical reasons, then it’s purely preference and recipe. Drumsticks are higher in meat and chicken wings are higher in skin and sauce surface area. I usually prefer drumsticks but wings win when the recipe makes the skin super crunchy or I want a higher ratio of sauce.

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    More seasoning to meat ratio. And the meat is tender like breast meat, but fatty enough to not be dry. Easy to eat with your hands and to share. Easy to cook fast and thoroughly in a deep fryer. And used to be dirt cheap. I remember 10 cent wing nights at bars to bring in people and make them thirsty. Basically selling them at cost. Would be more like 50 cents now. But they got popular, so you never see it anymore. Now they sell for a huge profit.

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Skin to meat ratio. Drum sticks fill you up faster, I eat wings for the spices and sauces not the meat. You can eat 12 delicious wings for every 6 delicious drumsticks. If you just want to get full faster go for drumsticks. If you want to savour the action of eating, go for wings.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And if you are dirt poor … you use the wing as a dipping stick to lap up as much of the sauce as possible by double/triple/quadruple dipping before consuming the chicken wing meat.

  • berkeleyblue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I‘d go for the drjmsticks in that case. Wings are great but legs are equally good and if they are cheaper, sign me up!

    Also those prices are insane… I pay 6.- over here for 500g of wings from the supermarket…