My wife and I started talking about this after she had to help an old lady at the DMV figure out how to use her iPhone to scan a QR code. We’re in our early 40s.

  • Joe@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a way to prove that someone gave/sold you some/all rights to some “thing”. Which would be important if anyone cared, but no-one does … with the exception of those who once thought that someone cared and are trying to recoup their “investment” by deceiving others.

    • Yewb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Images are dumb its the literal worst use case anything with direct ownership has a good use case for nft, probably needs a rebranding.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right, NFTs are just cryptographically secure receipts… Which is cool and all, but we’ve been getting by with non-cryptographically-secure receipts for a very very long time, so it’s kind of just a waste, and probably a misapplication of the technology.

    • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nfts are bragging rights, like having an original painting. You get to show people you have money by spending it on something extravagant but basically useless.