• Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Some definitions, sure. Not all of them. Not lawlessness and chaos, which is how it’s normally portrayed in the media. Ordered liberty without hierarchy is what it is.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The Wikipedia page seems to be generally correct. It’s a pretty broad political spectrum though with a reasonably long history. Some anarchists disagree with each other (as people in any group do) so there isn’t a perfect definition. The synopsis of the wiki is probably as good as you’ll get without reading the literature. Proudhon is probably the most famous anarchist, if you want to read up on his works.

        • bc93@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          anarchism 1: a political theory holding all forms of governmental authority to be unnecessary and undesirable and advocating a society based on voluntary cooperation and free association of individuals and groups 2: the advocacy or practice of anarchistic principles

          https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anarchism

          Not sure why you’re so obsessed with the dictionary. Is it some kind of kink or something? x

          • helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Your definition doesn’t sound like something with lots of rules…

            Not sure why you’re so obsessed with the dictionary.

            You mean the thing that establishes a common understanding of the meaning of words? Seems pretty important to me 🤷

              • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                You’re correct. The encyclopedia would be the wrong resource for this type of discussion.

            • bc93@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Arguing based on dictionary definitions is like, a meme. It’s like those facebook memes with the horribly written maths problems. The dictionary definition of a word will never capture the full nuanced meaning of the term. Arguing about it is pure pedantry.