• Landslide7648@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    That headline is false. You do not have to affirm Israel’s right to exist.

    You have to know that it’s illegal to call for the destruction of the state of Israel. That’s not the same.

  • Franconian_Nomad@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Alright, lets wrap that up, shall we.

    After looking at OPs comments and discussing with him it’s clear to me that he posted this article with a clear agenda.

    If Israel’s right to exist is a controversial topic, I‘m out.

    I have the opinion that it’s not antisemitism to call out an evil government and protest against its actions.

    Getting flustered about Germany saying Israel has a right to exist and not understanding historical reasons why that is the case is just naivety I hope.

    • ralphio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Bit of a double standard though, right? They don’t have to affirm Palestinian’s right to statehood. If not saying Israel is a legitimate state is anti-semitism, wouldn’t that make the same stance toward Palestine islamaphobia?

      • Franconian_Nomad@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yes. It’s a Double standard. It was born out of history. Namely the genocide on the Jews by the nationalsocialists.

        Germany doesn’t have a special history with Palestine, so they don’t get mentioned.

        And yes, I think Germany should recognise a Palestinian state.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          What does israel have to do with anti-semitsm?

          You keep intentionally conflating Judaism and Zionism after been corrected.

          Furthermore you don’t appear to know the history of israel. Zionists had been colonizing Palestine years before Hitler came to power.

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              But that’s the point. Recognizing israel is absolutely irrelevant to anti-semitism.

              If anything israel using Judaism as a shield for their war crimes is the biggest cause of anti-semitism.

              So this move by the German government does not combat anti-semitism. It creates anti-semitism by specifically calling israel a “Jewish” state.

              • Mrs_deWinter@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Recognizing israel is absolutely irrelevant to anti-semitism.

                Many people in this thread don’t seem to know this, but within German neo-Nazi movements that’s absolutely wrong. Revoking Israel’s right to exist is the number one talking point of the people doing hitler salutes again.

                • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  That’s completely false.

                  The AfD is full of antisemites. Nonetheless, it fully supports Israel.

                  Following Hamas’ October 7th attacks, Alexander Gauland (speaking as the honorary AfD chairman) said “The attack was not only aimed at the Jewish state, it was also aimed at us. Israel is the West in an environment that rejects and fights the West. When we stand with Israel, we are also defending our way of life”. This idea of ‘defending a way of life’ is common anti-immigrant rhetoric, and one the AfD frequently utilises to criticise immigration policy in Germany.

        • toastboy79@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          They are saying that your answer is indicative of the attitudes prevalent of your home instance. It’s a very common fediverse method of attempting to dismiss arguments that someone doesn’t agree with but can’t otherwise disprove.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The historical Nazi Germany was actually quite supportive of zionist efforts and interestingly the reverse was also true for some time before the holocaust got into full swing.

        • snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          The Nazi party supported zionist plans because they wanted more options for expelling Jews. That was antisemetic.

          Modern Germany is supporting the state of Israel’s existence because of modern antisemitic rhetoric about how Israel shouldn’t exist. This requirement is in opposition to antisemitism.

          The context is completely different.

            • snooggums@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              When any other country commits genocide, nobody says that country shouldn’t exist. They say that they should stop doing those things.

              There were a bunch of countries that were consolidated, created, or had lines redrawn after WWII along with Israel. Other than some choosing to split themselves once they gained autonomy, such as Yugoslavia, nobody is saying that those countries shouldn’t exist.

              The only country that regularly has people say it shouldn’t exist is Israel. The only reason people say that is because it is a Jewish ethno state. It is surrounded by ethno states that nobody says shouldn’t exist. The primary people pushing the “Israel shouldn’t exist” are antisemitic groups like neo nazis.

              Now, that isn’t to say that creating Israel was a good idea or done for good reasons, but enough decades have passed that it is established. There is plenty of criticism to be had about the genocide, apartheid, borders, and what Israel does wrong without leaping to the antisemitic idea that Israel shouldn’t exist.

              • footoro@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Found the hasbara bot. Just for the record states have no eight to exist. This concept doesn’t exist.

                Let’s assume for a second though that states would have such a right. When Nazi Germany committed genocide, hell yeah people said that state shouldn’t exist and they were right to say so. Apartheid South Africa, that state also shouldn’t have existed in the first place.

                To spin this further, the settler colonial states that got established through genocide on the indigenous population, e.g. the USA, Canada and Australia should have never existed in the first place. It’s not so difficult.

                Hence, why should I agree to an anyway non existing right for a settler colonial state to exist that can only keep existing through genociding the indigenous population and otherwise keeping it under an apartheid regime.

                • snooggums@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I think you have confused the structure and implementation of a state as a culture with a collective identity of people located within a rough geographic area.

                  A state’s right to exist is not the right to act a certain way, but the right to not be wiped off the map. A colonial state colonizing is only wrong because they are conquering other states that had their own right to exist. Otherwise there would be no reason to say that Palestine should exist, and Palestine should absolutely exist.

              • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Israel gains the right to exist when Palestinians grant it the right to exist.

                As it stands Palestinians do not recognize israel. There is an opportunity for israel right now to have a two state solution and have Palestinians recognize them. Yet israel is not accepting it. Because in their infinite Nazi wisdom they want to keep expanding the Lebensraum.

        • snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          A country being shitty doesn’t mean they don’t have a right to exist. Does Russia not have a right to exist? Did Iraq not have a right to exist?

          • acargitz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            White South Africa did not have the right to exist. Rhodesia did not have a right to exist.

            That’s what we are talking about.

            Israel has become a Jewish supremacist apartheid state. Its crimes have become so egregious and so entrenched (“facts on the ground”) that it is not unreasonable to argue that it cannot be reformed in its present form. In this case it is reasonable to argue for its replacement by a democratic successor state in which Jews and others will all have the same rights to freedom and safety.

            • snooggums@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              So funny story, South Africa was able to end apartheid without not existing.

              Imagine that!

              • acargitz@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Wake me up when Israel institutes universal suffrage and legal equality for everyone from the river to the sea, elects Marwan Barghouthi as president and changes it flag and anthem to incorporate Palestinian national symbolism. If such a country would like to still call itself Israel, I will be happy to be proven wrong.

                Because this is what ending apartheid means, buddy. Not just getting rid of Netanyahu, but deep structural change, and a commitment to justice, truth and reconciliation.

                • snooggums@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I favor a two state solution myself, as it is my understanding that is the desire of the majority of Palestinians.

                • snooggums@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Honestly, time. Time eventually changes things and Russia’s occupation of Crimea was only a decade ago and the founding of Israel was like 80 years ago. Israel’s continued expansion and settlement is wrong and comparable to Russia occupying Crimea.

  • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Germany, there’s a time and place for everything. This is like supporting a "sovereign citizen’s " right to freedom during a murderous rampage. It’s giving “blue lives matter” during George Floyd’s murder.

    • Franconian_Nomad@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Since many anti-semites use the current actions of Israel for, well for antisemitism, it’s the perfect time for it.

      The right to exist has nothing to do with the actions of the current government.

      Since what happened during the nazi regime, you surely can understand why Germany asks this question, don’t you?

      • abracaDavid@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Is the antisemitism in the room with us right now?

        Cause it seems an awful lot to me like y’all are just calling anyone protesting what Israel is doing to Palestine antisemitic.

  • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is idiotic. Gandhi hated that Pakistan split off and said that he recognized their existence but would never recognize their “right” to exist.

    That’s not even an international policy. Does Castile have a right to exist? Does Kashmir? Does Kurdistan? Why doesn’t Germany demand the same for others?

      • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        No. Germany can recognize Jewish lives and the worldwide Jewish community without needing to play into the hands of a rightwing apartheid state and getting involved smack in the middle of their political dispute. This isn’t hard; it’s like being able to say Black Lives Matter without having to support and endorse the controversial policies of Louis Farrakhan.

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yes.

          There is a VERY specific reason why Germany is doing this, whilst staying out of other issues. If I have to point out that reason then I think that maybe you should pick up a history book.

          Also they aren’t saying that Germany is recognizing Jewish lives and Jewish communities, it says the state of Israel, you know, that appareheids state currently working hard to commit genocide.

          Anyone bringing but this issue with either Israel or Palestine being good and the other side being evil is just downright lying for whatever reason. Germany pushing this for Israel really REALLY begs the question: okay, cool, Israel has a right to exist. What about Palestine, and Palestinians in general? Should we just off all of them? Eradicate all of them, men, women and children alike, no matter what country?

  • rxbudian@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    What happens if they affirmed that both Israel and Palestine’s right to exist?

    • Landslide7648@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s a multiple choice question. Also the headline is false. The question is:

      “What action relating to the state of Israel is prohibited in Germany?"

      The correct answer is “publicly calling for the destruction of Israel".

  • Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Exist? Okay sure, why not.

    Bomb a Population to a pulp? FUCK NO!

    And thats why I will NEVER vote for any of these fucks again! My Party won’t make it into the Bundestag? I DON’T CARE! Because the other Party’s won’t represent me anyway, so I can easily vote for my small Party which at least represents me!

    • adONis@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m avoiding all votes in my country due to their (all parties) silence on the current situation. Call me anti-democratic, but, for me, democracy died a long time ago.