just wondering

  • The Liver@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Fedora has given me more headaches than arch has, per unit time. At least in arch I can fix the problems myself without looking at obscure bug reports.

    It was a long time ago though, so I may be looking through anti-rose tinted glasses, misremembering, or misjudging my experience.

    I like to tinker with my system.

    NOTE: I’m not the person you were questioning.

    • aodhsishaj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I went from Debian to Arch to Alpine to Fedora, Fedora 38 was very much plug and play as far as drivers for the used laptops I buy. Been rock solid ever since.

      Distro hop and try it out, a live image is only a dd command away.

      • The Liver@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I know it was. Drivers are simple for my system anyways.

        I care more about the AUR and system customisation. Fedora has nothing like aconfmgr that I’m aware of. Nix’s system seems to be better but even more complicated.