No more men’s and women’s league, no more “gender eligibility” requirements, a common dresscode, same standards and rules for all.

Edit: since it looks like people missing the word let: the suggestion isn’t to force desegregation. It’s to allow it or even make it the default. Someone else made a good suggestion: segregate by attributes specific to the sport. In boxing it’s weight class, in basketball it could be height, in biking it could even be doped and non doped. Sex and gender need not be the very first thing to segregate by.

    • atro_city@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why does that matter? Men also have divisions and leagues. Team in the top leagues will destroy the leagues at the bottom.

      • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        why does it matter?

        Should we stop splitting sports by gender?

        It’s inherently boring to watch sports competitions between unequally capable people, and there is a natural difference in that that can be clearly attributed to gender.

        I admire your thought of equality but we need to talk about the differences in physique in genders as well if we wanna discuss this.

        Don’t dismiss this claim, scientifically debunk it or share why not and how you come to this conclusion.

        • atro_city@fedia.ioOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Of course people are differently capable, that why we have divisions, leagues, weight classes, and so on, even in the same sex. Why would that change when they all compete together?

          • Lauchs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            “Hey! Do you want to watch division 7 soccer? They have a woman on the team!”

            Hardly inspirational to girls everywhere. Whereas whenever I’ve caught the Canadian women’s soccer team, it’s usually at a pretty full arena with lots of girls teams there stoked to watch. I would never take that away from them.

      • dgmib@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The fastest a woman has ever run the 100m dash is 10.49 seconds.

        The Olympic qualifying time, that all runners needed to beat to even complete in men’s 100m dash this year was 10.00 seconds.

        If we didn’t have a women’s division, there couldn’t be women in sports.

        • atro_city@fedia.ioOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes, that’s a sport where segregation makes sense. But the suggestion isn’t to force desegregation, it’s to to let all genders compete against each other.

          • dgmib@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            We call it the “Mens” category, but for all intents and purposes it is the same as an “open to all genders” category.

            Female athletes don’t compete in it because they’re physically not strong enough to even qualify to compete in it at the world level. The gender they identify as or were assigned at birth is irrelevant. There’s no genetic testing requirement to compete at the men’s level.

            In almost every sport, the world record performance from a women isn’t even good enough to meet the minimum bar for quality to compete in the men’s competitions at the world level.

            Even sports like diving where you’re judged more than measured, the male athletes strength makes it possible for them to do things the female athletes simply can’t.

            There was a time when they only was open to all competition, adding a protected women’s only category was to make it fair for women. And then we started calling the open category the men’s category.

            We could call it the open category and the low-T category instead, and it would have the exact same participants in each.