• Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    Yeah and?

    Israel invaded their country and is committing genocide. It should come to no one’s surprise that Israel fucks around and finds out during a war they started.

    • rdri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      27 days ago

      a war they started.

      There are chances the outcome would be different if hamas released hostages, or didn’t attack Israel on October 7th. Those things were not smart. It didn’t serve any good purpose. A smarter thing would have been to prepare for such an attack from Israel by building defenses to protect civilians at the very least.

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        No there are not, this has been ongoing for decades and decades. Things would not have magically improved, it would have continued to be a slow death sentence whilst the world ignored it.

        What Hamas did, no matter how tragic, has done more to bring light and international support to the plight of the Palestinian peoples and exposed Israel as the monster it is than anything else ever has.

        • rdri@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          That didn’t worth it in my opinion. The level of international support is nowhere enough. And again, they could build defenses to decrease the number of victims.

          Also the premise of “Israel is a monster” sentiment is hugely weakened by the monstrosity of the October attack itself.

          • DonjonMaester@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            27 days ago

            No it’s not. More than one side can be monstrous in a conflict. “Yeah well but they did X so it’s okay that we did Y” is bible level reasoning aka no reasoning and pretty much what is causing the whole thing anyway.

            • YeetPics@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              27 days ago

              More than one side can be monstrous in a conflict.

              I agree, which is why I don’t support any monstrous regimes 🤷

              You don’t have to pick a side, it’s a moral trap and being super loud about having an opinion doesn’t stop the bloodshed or justify any of it.

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      This wasn’t an act of war, it was an act of terrorism. They shot passengers on a train. All casualties were civilian.

      • abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        Exactly! This is why I say Israel has a right to defend itself while Hamas should not be allowed to exist.

        Though recent events (like Israel’s pager attack) have made this argument much weaker…

        • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 days ago

          Eh, Israel, Hamas, and Hezbollah all have the right to exist, and to defend themselves. But we have to define that pretty strictly.

          Carpet-bombing Gaza isn’t defense.

          Slaughtering music festival attendees is not defense.

          Indiscriminate bomb planting and destination is not defense.

          Shooting up a train station is not defense.

          Bombing hospitals and aid trucks is not defense.

          I draw the line at deliberately or recklessly killing civilians.