Terry Gou, the billionaire founder of major Apple supplier Foxconn, announced on Monday a bid to be Taiwan’s president in January elections, saying he wanted to unite the opposition and ensure the island did not become “the next Ukraine”.

Gou is the fourth person to throw his hat in the ring, but his poll numbers before his announcement put him well behind the front-runner, the ruling Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) William Lai, who is currently vice president.

  • DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Gou said, adding “the era of entrepreneur’s rule” has begun.

    Well that doesn’t sound dystopian at all /s

    That’s all we need rn is another “gilded age” while capitalism continues to run amok.

        • Bondrewd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well fuck, you are the one who just hurled a senseless statement out there in the first place, I just answered with another one.

          What I despise with your statement is that the famous antidote is never mentioned. Replace or fix capitalism with what and how? And if you dont know anything better, why do you think its “bad”?

          • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            And if you dont know anything better, why do you think its “bad”?

            Do you lack the ability to learn from things outside of your direct first hand experience? History can’t teach you? A mentor can’t teach you? Can’t pick things up from context?

            • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I am not the person you’re responding to but if you know history you can see why everything else has failed and can’t be an improvement over capitalism. It would show a lot of good faith if you actually made a history backed argument instead of vaguely alluding to the existence of an argument.

            • Bondrewd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              What is the context? Seriously. Capitalism in my view is a controlled framework within which the general agreement is to give a wider control to individuals so they can create arbitrary entities that are more suited to solving certain issues. You can gain money, thus you are incentivized.

              Here are actual systems/organizations that can limit capitalism to small scale endevours:

              1. feudal hierarchies
              2. communist regimes
              3. Nazi regimes
              4. autocratic dictatorships
              5. small scale communes
              6. Military juntas

              Countries that have an actually good reputation in human rights, pollution, political conduct, are the most serious players of capitalism.

              The only reason the heavily socialist swedish subsidise your arse to no end and even make you found a company as a child, is so that you can do capitalism on a higher level. Well functioning socialism requires well functioning capitalist system. They synergise.

              So if you come to me with something like “capitalism bad”, I got no fucking way to react to that constructively. Elaborate, why did you arbitrarily put all the issues on the word “capitalism”.

              • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I never said capitalism was bad, I’m saying that your Ben Shapiro level logic of “hmmm you have a problem with free market capitalism yet you haven’t gone off and discovered a new piece of unclaimed land and made a different society from scratch.” Is just the lowest hanging fruit.

                Of course people can have issues with lack of regulation and social infrastructure while simultaneously still needing to eat and house themselves. They can’t just give up those things, they can change the system so that it works better for the majority instead of the 1%.

                • Bondrewd@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I was reflecting on the original comment since that is the origin of this debate.

                  And I did not mean that as a sincere question whether you know an alternative structure to capitalism. I think you cannot avoid it as it is inherently part of whatever you do, that is what I have been pointing out in multiple paragraphs.

                  I dont think there is a way to make it work better for the majority. Larger systems have unavoidable exponentiality and slower self-correction ability.

                  Except maybe some of the wealthiest countries that have no natural resources. Those are usually pretty uniform.

                  I think the highest aim is almost always progression and growth. The right circumstances are most likely the lack of easily exploitable resources within a certain society.

  • marrenia@astraea.pink
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is his main pull going to be the fact he fleeced the state of Wisconsin by taking advantage of a moron?

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    TAIPEI, Aug 28 (Reuters) - Terry Gou, the billionaire founder of major Apple supplier Foxconn, announced on Monday a bid to be Taiwan’s president in January elections, saying he wanted to unite the opposition and ensure the island did not become “the next Ukraine”.

    Gou is the fourth person to throw his hat in the ring, but his poll numbers before his announcement put him well behind the front-runner, the ruling Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) William Lai, who is currently vice president.

    Gou, 72, stepped down as Foxconn chief in 2019 and made his first presidential bid that year, but dropped out after he failed to win the nomination for Taiwan’s main opposition party, the Kuomintang KMT.

    Huang Kwei-bo, an associate professor of diplomacy at Taipei’s National Chengchi University and a former KMT deputy secretary general, said Gou’s candidacy risked further dividing the opposition vote.

    Gou reiterated a call for “unity” amongst opposition parties, urging Ko and Hou to sit down with him and discuss plans to join forces in order to win the election against the DPP.

    The run up to the election is taking place at a time of increased tensions between Taipei and Beijing, as China stages regular military exercises near the island to assert its sovereignty claims.


    The original article contains 685 words, the summary contains 211 words. Saved 69%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!