A lot of the things we do on a daily or weekly basis have ways of doing them that can either be private or communal, some of these which we do not think to consider as having that characteristic.

For example, bathing in the Roman Empire used to be communal, but then Rome fell and citizens in the splinter countries began taking baths privately.

Receiving mail is another example. There are countries which don’t have mailboxes and everyone gets their mail at the post office in the PO boxes. It was the United States which pioneered the idea of the modern mail system, which is why we associate it as a private act.

There are activities as well which don’t have any history as jumping between one or the other that might benefit from it, for example I think towns might benefit if internet was free and freely accessible but only at the local library.

What’s a non-communal aspect of life you think should be communal?

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I think towns might benefit if internet was free and freely accessible but only at the local library.

    Are you saying that private access to internet should be illegal?

    Or that your libraries don’t offer internet access to its patrons?

    • CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      If it’s only available at one place, it’s not freely accessible.

      Logistically, how would that work? Libraries would have to be everywhere and they’d have to be massive. The IT infrastructure to support that would be immense. How would privacy work? Where could I go to have a private telehealth appointment, for example?

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Freely accessible just means anyone can get to a library, no? I’m not saying that internet should ONLY be at the library. That’s OP, lol

        Libraries where I live offer internet access to any patron (who must be a resident of the city). I can comfortably walk to 3 libraries, but only 1 is within a 15-minute walk. Not everyone in my city is so fortunate, but someone with limited internet needs has many options for free here.

        • CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Oh I understood. I agree with you.

          I would argue that something that was once available at home that is then restricted to a single place that must be shared with lots of people isn’t freely accessible.

          My local library is within walking distance, but it’s pretty small. The Internet is free but not awesome in terms of speed.

    • CraigOhMyEggo@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The first one. Or perhaps it shouldn’t be illegal but rather discouraged in some way.

      • Vedlt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You do realize a significant portion of the internet is porn, right? There is no world in which everyone has to go to a communal public building for their pornography consumption that I’d be happy with.

      • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Gonna be honest there are few things I would like less than the criminalizing of my main way of keeping in contact with people. I genuinely think doing that would cause a spike in suicide rates because there are so many people who would just suddenly be completely isolated from having any community

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’m also curious as to why! (And I didn’t downvote you)

        Please let me know if you share in another comment!