• Troy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wind and solar are not magic bullets. Better than fossil fuels, yes. But they come with their own “the ocean is too big to pollute” type quagmires that we overlook when deployed on the small scale. The most basic example: solar panels are dark in colour – deploying a few of them is trivial, but deploying a lot of them over time will cause the average albedo of the earth to change, heating it. This won’t be a problem today, but would be in a century. Etc. Still better than greenhouse gasses though.

    Nuclear likewise has issues. You’re just straight up adding heat to the system. And depending on the reactor design, you have waste. But it’s a huge improvement over fossil fuels.

    • blazera@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Solar panels arent typical light surfaces, they dont convert all the light absorbed into heat, their whole point is they convert some light absorbed into electricity.

      Add onto the fact black is already a popular roof color.