• Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      Man, there’s way more than 52.

      He’s gonna need a Magic: The Gathering like system for all those fuckers.

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        Yeah, but I don’t think you’d even need to take out 52. After the first dozen or so, they’ll be more inclined to surrender their wealth and get off the list.

  • Korkki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 days ago

    Really highlights the fact that any free speech and naive western sense of freedom in these walled garden is just a button press away from being taken away and that there are no rules or standards. Whenever the owners or their friends feel even slightly displeased, annoyed or god forbid afraid the masks go off and the hammer falls.

    • ToucheGoodSir@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      That is a fair point. I’ve said it to numerous people talking about this subject: Americans are the most propaganda inundated people on the planet. There’s some quote about about how in China people know to not believe in the gov propaganda and here it’s just called the news lmao

      • TheEntity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 days ago

        Sadly look at email. Technically you can host it yourself but if you’re not one of the 15 or so big providers, good luck not being marked as spam before you even do anything.

        The real problem is with the oligarchy controlling everything, service or protocol. This is why Threads was/is dangerous.

        • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          And they’ve been systematically shutting down anonymous email services.

          Load up Brave with a tor connection, and try to sign up for anonymous email. When they can’t track you reliably, even the “anonymous” services require a confirmation email or phone number.

          • TotalCourage007@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 days ago

            Man I don’t want a future where we doxx ourselves to just be on a PC. Its insane that parents think real ID for gaming is a good idea. Linux might be the only way to escape any of this in the near future.

            • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 days ago

              They pretend it’s to protect us from illegal activity, but it’s really to protect them from whistleblowers.

              • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                15 days ago

                That’s not entirely true. The push for KYC came because spam started going crazy. You have no clue how bad spam is right now. And believe me, you don’t know. Take the worst case scenario you can think of, and multiply that by 100, and that starts to describe the state of spam emails for the past decade.

                • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  15 days ago

                  Did they suddenly put a stop to email spam, and no one told me? My spam folder says otherwise, but I can confirm the hit to privacy.

                  Maybe combating spam was just the excuse?

        • Badland9085@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          Somewhat unfair judgement against emails IMO, especially cause it’s the “trust list” that’s in the control of a few, with no open manner to add more people to the trust list. The protocol isn’t at fault for failing to prevent problems; it’s the ability for corporations to gain significant market share without control, before they are then allowed to put barriers down to disallow or discourage interaction between those in and out, forcing those within to stay in, while those outside to give up on others in order to gain usability.

          • TheEntity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 days ago

            That was my point too, I guess I wasn’t clear enough so thanks for elaborating. The protocol isn’t at fault, but something being a protocol (and not just a proprietary service) isn’t enough if the vast majority of the market share is being held by a few corporations.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        Do protocols solve the problem of every hop in between you and the destination has to pass through what amounts to someone else’s private property? Some private servers owned by who knows who on the way between that we have no idea whether they’re inspecting every packet that comes through or not.

        Because that’s the bigger issue, and I’m not even sure it’s one we can solve, because it’s pretty important to how the internet functions.

        A protocol still has to be supported and passed through private corporations walled gardens.

        Who else remembers Comcast illegally using Sandvine to throttle bittorrent traffic specifically? Pepperidge Farm 'members.

        https://torrentfreak.com/comcast-throttles-bittorrent-traffic-seeding-impossible/

        • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          That’s what integrity checks are for, so that no one along the path can edit what you say before it actually gets published.

    • militaryintelligence@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      They’ve been getting away with their class-war for so long any deviation from norms is alarming. Usually we just talk about black vs white, right vs left, etc.

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      Really just anyone with a certain amount of wealth should be forced to redistribute that wealth or face dire consequences.

    • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      I agree… What is it like 10% own 90% of the stock market, 1% own 50% or something like that? Major shareholders are the real evil oligarchy… CEOs are just shills they hire to take the bullet, same as politicians but paid better… I’d love to see some playing cards for the real oligarchy… But it’s pretty hard to really track them because they hide behind corporations and shit

    • addie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Having the suit one corner and the rank in the other is going to make these a bastard to play games with. How would you hold them in your hand so’s that you can see both?

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      That’s fucking bullshit.

      Another reason why crypto is the future: to free us from the control of banks.

  • glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    I think the cards are hilarious but they have something the other referenced sets (Iraqi, COVID) do not: silhouette targets on the back.

    I am by no means defending their removal but cards but maybe don’t give them a plausible excuse to remove them by implying that these cards are for shooting??

    • CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      The site comrade workwear opens with them on the front page, i was curious what type of workwear they had after this article.

      I’m looking for a replacement for dickies and another one, their quality has been absolute ass lately. €100 work jeans that get holes in them in a matter of days, those are not work jeans anymore.

  • Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Oof, the back of those cards is designed as a shooting target. So much for plausible deniability.

    Probably technically falls under free speech regardless.

      • peregrin5@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        Just as credible as social media platforms claiming they protect free speech, or corporations that claim they care about anything other than shareholders profits. Or Trump claiming he doesn’t support project 2025.

  • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Honestly? That very much feels like a “fuck around and find out” situation and a GREAT way to piss off rich people in the event someone else gets blue shelled.

    Also: Free speech doesn’t apply to social media. You can and will be banned for no reason other than someone with the power was bored.