• fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    European and UK universal healthcare is able to exist in it’s current form and at it’s current cost because the US has private healthcare.

    Healthcare Companies give heavy discounts to UK/EU to make extra money, they are fully funded by US payors and thus patients. If US healthcare went public and it ate into profits, and other countries run low on healthcare funds (the NHS, right now), private insurance or more likely, increased taxes, in those countries may be required. The NHS is already considering pay-to-play models.

    Note: This is a simplification of lots of details around the international transactions and legislation.

    Note 2: Before disagreeing, pick a pharma company and look at their annual report.

    Note 3: Clarified form and cost based on an astute commenter below.

    • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      Medical goods is around ~12% of healthcare expenditures. Even if US (richest country in the world) pays more they would have to pay insanely much more to subsidize single payer healthcare in the rest of the world.

      And why would pharma reduce prices in other parts of the world just because Americans pay more? It’s not a charity. They charge what the market will bear. Hepatitis C drugs were incredibly expensive because they prevented much more expensive liver transplants down the road. The market would bear a high price then.