• gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ya, that’s odd. I don’t know the specific regulations but wherever we draw a line it’s going to create edge cases that feel weird.

    Land ownership is odd in my opinion as well.

    What I really care about is the system we have now incentivizes increasing the cost of housing and that’s not how any society should be designed.

    • Fogle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes the problem is we view housing as an investment and people use their primary residence as a means of funding their retirement. Even if we individually set housing prices and people “lost” 3/4 of their home value they would still be able to buy another home with the value remaining because it would also be lowered. It would only affect using your equity to pay for life services. And even then, if we controlled rent prices and retirement home prices none of that would matter at all.

      The thing with homes and the stock market going up is that it doesn’t create value. All it does is take money from people working and trade it to people who “own” things.