• zephyreks@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Indian position on Sikhs is more radical than the Chinese position on Uyghurs. That’s… Depressing.

    • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      Indian position on Khalistani Sikhs is as radical as any other country would be against terrorists.

      The other 99.999% of Sikhs, are our brothers.

        • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          To me, it sounds like they’re terrorists simply because they’re separatists.

          Imagine if Canada considered separatist Quebecois as terrorists (yes, an infinitely small few were, but the vast majority just want a referendum)

        • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You know what the Indian Hindu majority and their media doesn’t seem to consider terrorism? Pogroms against Sikhs, or Muslims.

          So… that should tell you something.

        • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Highjacking and bombing aeroplane, attacking people opposing their POV, bombing in general, killing of prime minister.

          Your Western biased ignorance forgiven.