• Whirlybird@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Remember how everyone kicked up a giant stink about apple adding “on device CSAM scanning when uploading photos to iCloud”?

    They did that precisely because it would allow them to search for CSAM without giving up any privacy. As I said back when all that rage was happening, if apple don’t get to implement it this way you can be damn sure that the government is going to force them to implement CSAM scanning in a much more privacy-destroying way, and well here we are.

    • nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      CSAM without giving up any privacy.

      Hmmmm funny because security researchers said the opposite, I kinda believe them more?

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Who said it was givening up privacy. The worst I heard is slippery slope of they donthis they might ad more to it later. And how was it privacy compromising?

    • bigdog_00@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anything scanning messages or media on my device is an absolute NO if I don’t control it.

    • Proweruser@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Like the politicians would have cared. This is just a convenient excuse. Either they would have found another one or they would have said “we can’t trust Apple to scan for this material. The police has to do these scans!”

      We were right to oppose it then and we are right to oppose it now.

      • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        We were right to oppose it then and we are right to oppose it now.

        You were right to oppose doing it in the most privacy conscious way? Or were you against CSAM scanning at all?

        • jmfwnsfw@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It was a government provided list of hashes check against. For me, I don’t like it because I don’t trust 3 letter agencies to not abuse the ability to search every iDevice in the world for arbitrary file hashes.

          • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It was a database of hashes that were taken from the intersection of multiple country CSAM databases.

            Germany couldn’t just put a picture of a nazi in there and have every iPhone flag everyone that has a picture of a nazi on it unless multiple other countries also had that same picture in their CSAM db.

            It also only happened when you uploaded the photo to iCloud. Know what they do now instead? Just scan for CSAM on iCloud like google, Microsoft, imgur, Reddit, etc all do.

            The end result is the same in detecting CSAM, but the way apple proposed was more secure and valued your privacy more.