Foreign Minister Eli Cohen told Israeli Army Radio that Israel’s war aims are not just the total destruction of Hamas, but the country also aims to reduce the size of Gaza. The pronouncement is the most explicit indication yet that Israel will move to annex parts of Gaza, as some analysts have speculated.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Isreal has shown time and again that they have no qualms blatantly stealing land. Doubt they needed the justification.

    • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Okay, I’m willing to believe that Israel had a contingency plan ready to exploit the political leeway created if they were hit by a terrible attack. Like “if they kill a bunch of Israelis, this is our shopping-list of objectives to gain ground and kill targets in a time when the world can’t criticize us”. I would believe there are people in the Israeli military who are amoral enough to do that.

      However, believing they looked the other way when they knew about an impending attack strains credulity.

      And if you’re believing they were active participants in orchestrating an attack on their own people? That means you need your tinfoil hat loosened.

      • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        And if you’re believing they were active participants in orchestrating an attack on their own people?

        Well, they did fund hamas…

      • mlg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        As dumb as it sounds, the FBI actually found and red flagged a few of the 9/11 terrorists months before the attack.

        Of which the CIA, DoD, and White House convincently ignored.

        I don’t really think Israel set this up, but sometimes I wonder if there’s intentional negligence because how else do you miss such a significant planned attack.

        Although both could also be explained by bluffs. Maybe they really didn’t think Hamas was actually going to go through with anything, especially since there was no building escalation.

        Which would make sense because Mossad’s intelligence is supposed to be world-renowned.

      • Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s hard to argue that the escalations of harassment, settler expansion, and killings of Palestinians in 2023 wouldn’t lead to some sort of retribution attack by Palestinians. I think the Israelis were shocked by the success of the attack and the failure of their security system to minimize the damage. I don’t think they were oblivious when many analysts and even the Egyptian government suggested a few days earlier that things were getting hot (they didn’t warn of an imminent attack like was reported in some media, but that there was an increasing threat of some sort of violent resistance to Israel’s violation of international law).

        Israel knows they’re violating the 1967 borders, they also know how bullying works. Every few months, bulldoze some houses and claim that area as your own. Keep squeezing and poking until your victim lashes out violently and then use that violence as justification to be more violent. It’s a classic bully tactic.

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      A ploy? Meaning they hired Hamas to attack and kill their own people so they could then take more land?

        • capital@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          What you linked is very different than “this latest attack is a ploy to take more land”.

          Your own fucking source suggests it was an attempt to maintain what little peace they could.

          Did you even read it? Did anyone who downvoted me read it?

          • kurwa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sure maintain peace, and not undermine the Palestinian Authority. That’s why he gave the radical group support.

          • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The point of that link is to show you that bibi has ties with hamas and it’s not out of the realm of possibility that he still has some sorts of connection, if not influence then intel.
            The plot of “provoke an attack - allow it to happen - retaliate with force - steal land as a result” isn’t that hard to imagine, because this shit happens all the time. Even I remember the exact same thing from 2 years ago

      • panda_paddle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        In less than 10 hours after the hospital blast, Isreal released a torrent of evidence they didn’t do it. Video, film, conversations, informants, ect. But I’m suppose to believe they were in the dark about the Octobet attack? Even after advanced warning from the U.S and Egypt. That dog won’t hunt monsignor. At best they didn’t know how bad it would be.

        • Ooops@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          They were totally in the dark, yet hours later justified every bomb with their precise information of how every single bomb target was a known hideout for Hamas terrorists.

      • Ooops@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, they didn’t hire Hamas. They actually created them like they exist today.

        By not doing anything after the Oslo agreements and just sitting their happily that they could de facto occopy the area while someone else (the internation community) pays until Hamas got a majority in 2006.

        By even then not supporting the peaceful side against Hamas but sitting their gloating as Palestinians killed Palestinians.

        By indirectly supporting Hamas to use them as an excuse showing that the National Authority isn’t speaking for Palestinians and so there is no need to work with them in any way.

      • TheEgoBot@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, all they did was unlock the door and turn off the security cameras, same result tho. The rave was birdseed in the middle of a giant red target.