• Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Guns can provide opportunity, but (in spite of Mao claiming to be communist) it truly comes from the joining of people for common cause. A gun can help even the playing field, but it can easily be abused by those with ulterior motives.

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Yeah, power can be abused, what else is new? But people joining for a cause also doesn’t do much if they don’t have the means to enforce their cause with violence - usually they’ll just get overwhelmed by whoever does have the means for violence. Peaceful revolutions are possible (e.g. Indian independence), but they require relatively specific circumstances and a lot of people who are willing to stay nonviolent even as they’re beaten up (and worse) by the police. I suppose you can do almost anything peacefully if your group is large enough and has enough cohesion, but that’s incredibly difficult to achieve and I think it’s actually more difficult nowadays, because everyone has a handheld communication device on them at all times that’s filled with fascist propaganda.

          • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            I suspect the idea of other countries/British citizens/colonists eventually responding violently to the British treatment of India played a role in britains calculus as well.