I’m in the US.

I haven’t discerned a pattern, by the media, in the titling of the horror currently underway.

I’ve seen Al Jazeera use both phrasings. I haven’t determined that other media sites are hardlining their terminology either, but I notice the difference as I browse.

Maybe it doesn’t mean anything, but these days people seem extra sensitive about names.

  • zepheriths@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hamas is elected via a minority of Gaza as a result Hamas doesn’t act with the will of the majority and calling this the Israeli-Gaza war is disingenuous to the people of Gaza.

    • Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hamas were elected in January 2006 and have refused new elections since.

      • anarchost@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The average person in Gaza was somewhere between “way too young to vote” and “didn’t exist yet” the last time an election was held

    • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Isn’t Gaza losing more people to this so called war than either Hamas or Israel?

      This feels like saying there was a fight between two people and not mentioning that the biggest fighter only seemed to really be attacking a third smaller, less-aged person for some odd reason.

  • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    When Israel stops bombing Gaza residents indiscriminately I will then consider calling it a war against Hamas.

  • weeeeum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    To me it’s who’s trying to kill who. Hamas (the group) wants to destroy Israel, Israel in turn wants to destroy Hamas, not Gaza (this part is actually very subjective)

    • silicon_reverie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a good way to frame things. As an outsider, the subjectivity of the IDF’s target is why I wonder if people are choosing one term for the war over another. Some see the intentional bombing of refugee camps, ambulances, and aid convoys as targeting the civilians of Gaza in what amounts to a systematic extermination of Palestinians. The casualty numbers seem to heavily favor that interpretation. So could this be one reason for some news outlets to frame the conflict as Israel vs Gaza itself? Or is the word choice more nuanced than that, given how it seems as though the two names are being used interchangeably on both sides of the line?

      • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Israel is definitely attacking Gaza, but Gaza isn’t an entity with the ability to fight back. Thus ‘Israel–Gaza war’ is a false equivalence.

        Similarly, ‘Israel–Hamas war’ is troublesome because both are also attacking people not part of the conflict.

        Maybe it’s ‘a series of Israel & Hamas terrorist attacks in the region of Gaza’ 🤷

      • redballooon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Whoever thinks Israel purposefully targets civilians ignores how Hamas operates. It has been documented for years by the UN and human rights organizations that they use civilians as shields.

        Getting Palestinian civilians dead is part of their strategy.

        • squirmy_wormy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s also entirely unfair to the long standing apartheid state Israel has run against Palestinians. Push anyone long enough and they push back.

          Kids throw rocks? Fuckin execute them, according to the IDF.

          • redballooon@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m not defending Israel settlements in the West Bank.

            But that’s largely independent from Hamas actions or intentions. Hamas was founded before the first intifada, and it existed at relatively peaceful times when the talks about a two state solution were meant serious on the Israeli side. Their intentions then were not different from today’s.

            Hamas never wanted peace, and they never wanted to peacefully coexist.

            (*) edit: wait did you say me pointing out how Hamas uses civilians as shields is unfair against the Hamas??

            • squirmy_wormy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I had a problem with your opener:

              whoever thinks Israel purposefully targets civilians…

              They have for a while, and currently they are. And it’s well known and historically proven that behavior like that results in backlash eventually. And then nothing good happens.

              • redballooon@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                they currently are

                You didn’t read the follow up after my opening that you had problems with.

                Or you are ignoring how Hamas operates.

                The claim that Hamas reacts to anything that Israel does in the West Bank is a myth.

  • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a nice bit of doublespeak.

    Imagine if the UK started carpet-bombing major cities in Northern Ireland, and called it UK vs the IRA, as opposed to UK vs NI.

    See, we’re not killing people, we’re killing terrorists. It’s fine, stop complaining, just let us do it.

  • Throwaway@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hamas is the organization that runs gaza. Theyre the largest political party in Palestine, they collect taxes, and they have an army. Imagine if the US Army was on the election ballot, and ran the East Coast.

    Its essentially the same thing, just “Hamas/Israel” reminds you of what Hamas does, and “Gaza/Israel” is trying to erase that.

    • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They have not allowed an election to be held in 17 years. They’re no more a “political party” than the Taliban.

  • Phantom_Engineer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It matters very little. It’s performative, trying to justify the conflict by framing it one way or another. The reality on the ground will remain the same no matter what the media calls it. Ultimately, it will be historians that name the war.

    The combatants are Israel and Hamas. The location is Gaza. Conclude from that what you will as far the “proper” name for the conflict.

    • theFriendWhoIsAsking@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The combatants are the IDF and Hamas. The location is Gaza. But if the ones dying aren’t soldiers but rather ordinary civilians, and if those civilian deaths aren’t tragic accidents but rather the intended outcomes of the attacks, some might believe this isn’t a war between militaries. This is a slaughter of populations. This is terror. This is genocide.

      Hamas attempted such an act on Israel. But right now, the IDF is bombing refugee camps, targeting ambulances, blocking humanitarian aid convoys, and murdering men, women, and children - civilians - by the literal thousands.

      Israel-Hamas, Israel-Gaza, it’s all performative. You’re right. But there’s a lot of subtext behind each performance. Is this a war against a small terrorist cell, or an extermination of a territory and all those who call it home? I can’t speak to the motives of newscasters using either wording, but just like OP, I do wonder what they’re trying to convey.

  • masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Israel-Hamas War” vs “Israel-Gaza War”?

    Both are pure propaganda - Israel, and the western countries that backs it, wants to pretend that this is some “new” conflict and not the very same one Israel has been waging non-stop against Palestinians since 1949.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems to be like a more accurate description would be the Israeli perpetrated Gazan genocide. Calling it a war is like taking a flamethrower to your backyard because you stepped on a nettle and then calling it lawn care

  • downpunxx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    Gaza was given to Arabs for self rule and determination in 2005, all Jews left Gaza, even Jewish graveyards were dug up and moved, it was theirs to do with as they liked.

    They’ve spent the last 18 years making into a terrorist Disneyland with a dozen Islamofascist terrorist organizations with the stated goal of killing Jews and destroying the state of Israel, they’ve fired hundreds of thousands of missiles into Israel indiscriminately targeting civilians, and launched countless cross borders attacks against Jewish civilians, including one that caused the largest loss of Jewish life in any single day, anywhere, since the Holocaust on October 7th.

    They were given Gaza to live in freedom and self determination, they used it to kill Jews. They were warned. They chose to ignore the warnings.

    These acts of terrorism were perpetrated by the entire Gazan community, they voted for Hamas, and allowed Hamas to rule their government for the last 17 years, Hamas and all the other Islamic terrorists in Gaza are not outsiders, they were born in Gaza of Gazans, they were raised in Gaza, they were educated in Gaza, they married and had children of their own in Gaza, their Parents, teachers, mosques, hospitals, are all in Gaza, from which they use to hid and store weapons to attack Jews, Hamas, PIJ and all the other Islamic terrorist in Gaza ARE Gaza, there has been no uprising in Gaza, there have only been attacks on Israel. This is what Gazans have supported and sacrificed for in every way they possibly could.

    And now it’s here. I do hope they enjoy what they’ve worked generationaly to achieve.

    There will be no ceasefire this time.

    • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Who is they? Hamas didn’t win a majority in the 2006 election. Then they fought a civil war and took autocratic control in 2007. So what are you talking about when you say they? It certainly isn’t all Gazans or Palestinians.

      You’re championing genocide and the wholesale slaughter of civilians. Do you honestly believe that a terrorist attack allows the unrestrained murder of civilians?

        • PupBiru@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          that word doesn’t mean what you think it means

          actually, i think it’s you that doesn’t understand what the word means so here’s the definition:

          Genocide is the intentional destruction of a people in whole or in part. In 1948, the United Nations Genocide Convention defined genocide as any of five “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group”. These five acts were: killing members of the group, causing them serious bodily or mental harm, imposing living conditions intended to destroy the group, preventing births, and forcibly transferring children out of the group. Victims are targeted because of their real or perceived membership of a group, not randomly.

          partial targeting is still genocide

          • A_Dude@lemmy.ninja
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            1st of all, Hamas terrorist attacks also fall into that definition. Secondly, IDF has not targeted any "national, ethnical, racial or religious group”. IDF goals are to eliminate Hamas militants inside the Gaza strip. The general Gazan population was given weeks of advance notice and provided safe/r places to evacuate to. If 100% of the civilians had chosen to cooperate, and Hamas had not forcibly used them as human shields, then there would be no casualties. Clearly that is not a realistic scenario, but it’s important to understand the genocide definition requires intent . IDF is actually attempting to minimize casualties whenever possible. Unfortunately it often isn’t.

            • PupBiru@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Hamas terrorist attacks also fall into that definition
              yup you’re absolutely right and nobody here is disputing that… this isn’t a black and white one side good one side bad situation: BOTH hamas and israel are fucking awful here… you’re also probably going to say that it’s hamas’s fault that civilians are being killed because they’re using them as human shields… also right! however, that doesn’t absolve israel of all responsibility: there’s a lot more they could be doing to reduce the civilian casualties

              civilians had chosen to cooperate
              yeah cool how about you leave your home and basically everything you own so that it can be bombed to shit and see if you just cooperate… don’t blame the people who are just bystanders

            • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The general Gazan population was given weeks of advance notice and provided safe/r places to evacuate to. If 100% of the civilians had chosen to cooperate, and Hamas had not forcibly used them as human shields, then there would be no casualties.

              So any country can say all civilians in an area must leave immediately. And if they don’t, it’s ok to indiscriminately murder civilians? Are you insane?

              IDF is actually attempting to minimize casualties whenever possible.

              They most certainly are not. They have bombed hospitals and refugee camps after claiming that Hamas terrorists were among them. That’s a war crime.

              Intent is satisfied by reckless disregard for known dangers, if you really want to go down the legal route.

        • MuchPineapples@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What does religion have to do with this? Israel is a fascist state illegally colonizing Palestine in search for more lebensraum, while detaining random Palestinians for sometimes years without a trial in prisons where torture is fully accepted in what only can be described as concentration camps. All the while bombing civilians, including lots of children, and now effectively creating an open air prison without food, water and electricity where they indiscriminately bomb whoever they can as result of a nationwide hate against a specific ethic group.

          Yet some people claim they are the good guys.