Tech company has no data.

  • Eigerloft@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    ·
    1 year ago

    Uh oh, someone’s commercial real estate investments must not be performing as well as they expected.

    • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      1 year ago

      None are doing well. It’s the next big bubble to pop and it’s going to hurt real bad. Bidens plan to convert office space to residential sounds like a savior for commercial real estate but it will take years and not everyone can be at the front of the line.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bidens plan to convert office space to residential sounds like a savior for commercial real estate

        For the owners…

        He’s giving them millions (I think actually billions) for them to make those office spaces trendy expensive condos most people won’t be able to afford.

        Rather than telling the disgustingly wealthy people that own those offices to pay for it themselves while prioritizing affordable housing for people who need it.

        • Hyperreality@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Trendy, expensive, poorly insulated, poorly suited, overly priced condos.

          You can’t easily convert open plan office space into suitable residential housing.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d much prefer a solution that benefits lower and middle income people, but this proposal is a pragmatic one.

          He’s giving them millions (I think actually billions) for them to make those office spaces trendy expensive condos most people won’t be able to afford.

          That will certainly be some, but I doubt even a majority of the final residence of these converted buildings. First, there just aren’t that many rich people that will buy a multi-million dollar converted office building residences. When the market for the rich is exahusted, there’s likely still plenty of converted buildings which means the price per unit declines to more reasonable (not cheap, admittedly) housing costs. This has a knock on effect with the entire residential real estate market. Existing housing will get cheaper everywhere just because the larger supply of housing inventory appearing essentially out of nowhere (because offices took this land off the residential market decades ago).

          Further, people want amenities around their residence. Things like grocery stores, restaurants, dentists, etc. With enough people (of any income level) these services will start to appear. So lots of jobs, and if housing in this area for workers, then the salaries of these workers will have to be raised significantly higher to get staff.

          So with one macro decision, lots of this can occur.

          Rather than telling the disgustingly wealthy people that own those offices to pay for it themselves while prioritizing affordable housing for people who need it.

          The large majority of office owners won’t make this conversion on their own right now. So what you’re advocating for is for all those buildings to sit empty for possibly decades. So do you want that housing to exist now or 20-30 years from now when each developer slowly makes that choice. This is the ugly, but pragmatic, reality about getting change in our society.

        • Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This is prioritizing affordable housing

          Even if they’re expensive condos, supply and demand still applies. Other housing will go down in price.

          I swear people here would punch a gift horse in the mouth

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            1 year ago

            Never forget FDR wanted Social Security to be universal healthcare… And so did the people who voted for him.

            “Moderates” just kept telling he had to wait, and when he kept getting elected they changed the rules to get rid of him.

            It’s why I hate people like Biden still say “it’s too soon”

            We’ve literally been told that longer than Biden has been alive, and that’s a long fucking time.

            They’re never gonna say it’s time.

            • Lauchs@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It would’ve been time if folks under 35 voted in the primaries at the same rates as those over 65.

              Until that happens, yeah, it’s probably going to be the elderly deciding when it’s time.

            • starbreaker@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              This is why I hate the Democratic party almost as much as I hate the Republicans. They’re not the same, but they’re both scum and I want them all to shit themselves to death. Unfortunately, we’re stuck with the Dems as the closest thing the GOP/KKK has to an effective opposition.

              • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                From a European perspective, the USA is effectively a single party state, and within that party there is a right wing and a very right wing.

                • starbreaker@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I know. But try telling that to centrists and liberals in the US. They just give you shit for thinking “both sides are the same”. No, you ignorant shitfountains, they’re not the same. It’s neoliberals on one side and neo-Nazis on the other, and neither of them give a fuck about anything but rimming their billionaire donors.

  • essteeyou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    ·
    1 year ago

    When I worked at Amazon we had data for every little decision we made. Do you want to change the color of a button? Run an A/B test and see if it improves some metric.

    Want to stop supporting a 5-year-old device? Go determine the total number of impacted people and figure out some way to compensate them.

    Want to get promoted? Get 5 people you worked with to answer specific questions about your work over the last year.

    Want to make an entire workforce return to an office after they kept your company afloat during a pandemic? Want to increase commute time? Want to increase cars on the road? Want to make new parents spend less time with their kids? No need for any data, some guy says he knows better.

    • dubble_deee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      These days all the data used to inform decisions internally feel like they’re completely made up to support whatever bias the manager already has. This used to be an org dependent problem but it’s everywhere now, AWS, retail, digital.

      • nicetriangle@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep all those countless hours of travel, gallons of gas, car repairs, transit fares, etc we’ve been covering out of pocket our whole working lives has been a free subsidy to commercial real estate companies.

        • Hyperreality@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It really is absurd.

          I’m returning to the job market, and I’m honestly thinking of getting a shitty job within cycling distance, rather than be forced into commuting again.

          I honestly don’t know how much more they’d have to offer me, just to force me back in my car. It certainly won’t be nothing or vague promises.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have very real examples of this being the case where I am. There’s a lot of real estate that if it falls in value it materially impacts the exec leadership. No wonder they are so keen to save Pret.

    • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      People who have investments in:
      • corporate real estate and companies like Blackrock, Concord Pacific and Amazon who easily own tens of billions of dollars of corporate real estate.
      • downtown coffee shops that exist to ripoff serve otherwise stranded office workers.
      • car and oil companies because all that rush hour traffic makes them money.
      • road construction companies since rush hour traffic jams means easy bribing governments into paying billions for complex and frequently experimental road enhancements.

  • sonals@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hey, I worked for this moron and left because of these moronic statements.

    Absolutely mind boggling that this company is “run on data” yet there’s no data besides anecdotes to support this backwards idea.

    To make it even funnier, here’s an Amazon Director apologizing on LinkedIn because they thought forcing people to come into an office was the right thing to do.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      83
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Compromise is the moment a group has given up on finding the best solution

      What a toxic and zero-sum viewpoint. What a stark admission that someone is unable to be willing to consider the possibility that someone else might be right, or at least partially right. If this philosophy was prevalent at Microsoft in 2010+, it would explain a number of Microsoft corporate decisions. Putting a smartphone touchscreen UI on a computer server product (Windows 2012) being just one obvious example.

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Strongly agree. If anything, compromise is necessary for finding the best solution for everyone, especially as we’re all different.

        That manager thinking that compromise is “giving up” needs to get out of the selfish delusion and come back to reality. Feel sorry for the subordinates!

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The reasons to be accepted for a mid-level and above management position have long stopped including “being a leader”.

      • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Doesn’t it also contradict his own decision? Below that quote he also says:

        compromises that preserved cohesion were tantamount to “deciding to lose”

        Forcing RTO is maintaining the status quo, which itself is a compromise you make to not do anything about the changes that happen as time goes on. He is literally making a compromise to preserve cohesion. But I guess in his mind him making compromises with himself don’t count, the only compromise that matters is the one he has to make with others.

    • MysticKetchup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      1 year ago

      If this dude “loved every minute of the 80+ hour work weeks of the early 2000’s”, feels like I can safely ignore anything he has to say about work

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        He was in his early 20s based on his stated age, bro-ing out with beers and code, likely making gobs of startup money when you could still reasonably buy a house, which is likely worth 10x what it was then.

        Now he makes 700k or more, living in his basically free house, and needs to put on a show for current 20 somethings like that is something good that can still happen to them.

      • ⓝⓞ🅞🅝🅔@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Exactly. I reread this twice because I felt like I had certainly read it wrong in the first place… which I had not…

    • afk_strats@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Working from home also had, from my observation, a massive and materially beneficial impact on females specifically working mothers, who bare a disproportionate share of domestic work.

      Ew

        • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What I don’t get, is that, female clearly applies to any living species right?

          Women refers to female humans.

          It’s so easy to say “women” because you are talking about people. The word “female” has no such implication.

          I truly think the repetitive and serious use of “females” instead of women is actually an attempt at degrading the status of women in society.

          But not like “oh its already bad” but more intentional now. It worries me, because there are a lot of political persons using the language too.

          • Aviandelight @mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Saying “females” is just one step above saying “bitches.” That’s how it hits my ear at any rate.

            • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Eh, “bitches” is better now. If only because is can be used to describe friends. I can not see a group of people out on the town calling themselves party “females”.

    • Kichae@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      In business, all data are vanity metrics. If they make you look good, you slap that shit on everything; if they make you look bad, you “don’t have it”.

      It’s just that sometimes you can use negative data to make decisions that look good to those above you, and sometimes you know that you can’t.

      • Poggervania@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Hell, businesses might even keep asking you to keep changing criteria and numbers until they hear what they want to hear. I literally am dealing with this right now for a local retailer; they keep insisting that I keep changing criteria and numbers relating to how many sales they closed until they hear an answer they like. When I gave them the raw numbers, the owner and manager were straight-up in denial about it and said I was wrong and that the data is off because they felt it should have been a different number than presented.

        Fucking frustrating and stupid, but that’s how upper management and corporate people can be apparently.

  • Iwasondigg@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    1 year ago

    Over the last 15 years these tech leaders have led the charge to offshoring. Now they’re telling us we have to work with people on the other side of the world - unless we’re in the same timezone. Then we have to be “together” but separated into cubicles. Their logic makes no sense.

    • GreenEnigma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s because their logic isn’t about what they claim it’s about.

      It’s about control.

      • Archer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Gotta keep the poors in line with the knowledge they can be made poorer at any time, with their kids as hostages

      • Iwasondigg@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I hear to really boost morale, we might get to wear jeans on Fridays. I mean, working from home is great, but have you ever gone into the office in non-business casual clothes?

        • IMALlama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          What industry/retion do you work in? I’m over the Midwest and was in the office today in jeans and a graphic tee.

  • GuyWithLag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Amazon is extremely data-centric at that management level. If he’s not showing hard data, then the data he has go against the narrative he’s pushing.

    • Basil@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which is confusing to me, obviously working from home tends to be more productive, and I’m sure they’ve seen that, so why RTO?

      • Phoonzang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because WFH has shown that large parts of middle management are useless, and those MM people are pushing upper management for RTO before it becomes evident. It’s what MM has always done, suck up to UM and kick down on the workers, without real benefit to the company.

      • Mildmantis@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Productivity must mean nothing when you’ve got a giant commercial real estate hole burning in your pocket.

        Think of all the wasted money! (For the company, not the workers as they commute, buy lunch, hire nannies, etc)

  • afk_strats@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is extremely typical for Amazon corporate.

    They have the data because they ask (corporate) employees about their working experience constantly. I’m sure employees love the option to WFH. But they don’t like the data (typical) because they spent billions building cheap, crowded, loud office space around the world.

    So what do they do? They pull out the mantra, “Disagree and Commit”, which is Amazon manager speak for “shut up and do what I say.” Ironically, Disagree and Commit is actually “Have Backbone, Disagree and Commit” and is about finding alternative solutions or data when you think the company is doing the wrong things rather than keeping quiet.

    Amazon, like most American corporations is an oligarchy and it’s run terribly at the top with dire consequences for their employees, customers, and the world.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      cheap, crowded, loud office space

      Just reading these words hurts. I’ll never forget visiting Fitbit’s offices. They had these extra narrow desks - imagine a regular office desk but without the extra width for that rolly-drawer. They were strung out in long rows, smack up against each other side to side. And the rows were also arranged back to back. When everyone was sitting down, the legs of their chairs would interfere, and they had nowhere to put their backpacks except down in that mess of chair legs. The place was a constant high volume din, and if it wasn’t you’d be listening to the people in either side of you breathing. Need to get up and leave? Prepare to tiptoe through that entire mess for 10-20 desks until you reach an aisle.

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Are there stats on how many more sick days people in the office take? I don’t really catch anything except from the kids, and I’m almost never sick enough to not at least send a couple emails.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was just there to give a presentation and walked through the place once. It gave me such heebie jeebies even from just that… I can’t imagine what it must have been like for people working there.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The “open office” mindset that supposedly “increases collaboration, reducing errors” blah blah blah.

        Because of this nonsense, I reserve meeting rooms every day so I have somewhere to work that’s quiet.

      • Zima@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        this reminded me of a quote from a tv show i’m watching. “Hell is just the product of a morbid human imagination, The bad news is whatever humans can imagine they can usually create”

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The “open office” mindset that supposedly “increases collaboration, reducing errors” blah blah blah.

        Because of this nonsense, I reserve meeting rooms every day so I have somewhere to work that’s quiet.

    • flames5123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep. There have been so many people having backbone since this was announced in January. The remote-advocacy slack channel is the third largest opt in channel (pay-equity is the largest opt in, with people posting their salaries anonymously). There have been many protests and many people pushing back.

      It’s all about the money to these corporate execs. Tax cuts, real estate value, parking lot payments, etc.

      I will say that working in the office with others on your team has benefits. However, I’m not working with my team directly for 3 days a week. We could do a couple design days a few days a month or even a full week a few times a quarter and that would cover the bases. Half my team is on the other side of the US anyways.

  • Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 year ago

    ‘I don’t have data to back it up, but I know it’s better’

    This is exactly the reason why every single one of Amazon’s products are shittier today than they were yesterday.

  • xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s time to flay the skin from Amazon executives. I don’t have the data to back it up, but I know it’s better.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just a reminder that if you commute by car it’s probably the most dangerous thing you do every day. This guy is literally saying “I have no data but I want you to risk your lives and waste your money twice a day.”

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Go chat with Google Bard about work from home vs return to office. Bard is not a fan of WFH. Strange!

    • wishthane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bard doesn’t truly think, it’s just going to be reflective of the most commonly written perspective in its source material

  • vanveen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    I read a lot of comments of angry, rightfully angry, people toward Amazon and its exploitative work policy. I do not buy from Amazon since 2012; I’ve thrown away my Kindle and told myself F**k that predator. (You cannot hire workforce that has to live with food stamps because your wage isn’t enough, I mean, how corrupt one must be to do something like that?)

    I wonder how many of you are actually boycotting Amazon? Out of curiosity. I’m Italian and I am petrified that here is imported the Amazon model. And I’ll fight with all the energy to stop this Hun who, btw, does not pay taxes. It’s immoral and it’s unexplainable how his business can be legal.

    • slumberlust@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m doing the same, but must admit it feels fruitless sometimes. 99% of people will just lap up whatever shit is fed to them and ask for seconds.

      Amazon has a serious customer trust issue. Their reviews are fake, their prices aren’t competitive, their shipping promise is routinely broken, and you will likely receive a counterfeit product.

      Do not order tech products from Amazon. Co-inventory means you will get whatever item the picker picks, not the store you order from.

    • Mun_Walker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Had my Amazon account with thousands on it stolen by someone. They wouldn’t help and actually recommended I get a new one and re-purchase prime and all my stuff. So no. I don’t think I’ll be going back.