• WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    After looking at that diagram I have to ask - why in the everliving fuck would a pressure bearing panel like that be hung by bolts and not inserted into the cabin and held in place by the ribs of the fuselage? I mean seriously?

    • EeeDawg101@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t get why they don’t just make it a bit bigger on the inside so that when pressurized, the pressure itself seals it. Seems like a fail safe solution instead of this shadiness.

      • Starfighter@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It is, kind of. The plug is secured by 6 stops (or tabs) along each side. The positive pressure differential pushes the plug outwards into those stops.

        To remove the plug you uninstall 4 bolts which allow the plug to go up and over the stops, after which it can hinge outwards on a hinge found at the bottom of the plug.

        Source: https://youtu.be/WhfK9jlZK1o?si=dbUV1i2nNFcNixQh

        • EeeDawg101@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Just seems like a better design would be if no bolts existed (like from them loosening over time and falling off), it would still be sealed perfectly fine. The obvious failure point is the bolts and seems they could do better.

    • GombeenSysadmin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s a door plug, which means it’s meant to be replaced with an actual door if required, so a lot of the hardware for an actual door are in place. Doors are designed to slide in, then raise up so the stop pins engage the stop fittings from the inside, so the door is in effect bigger than the hole it’s in. this video provides a detailed explanation of how it works.

      The big issue here is that the airplane is only 2 months old, it was delivered from Boeing in late October. Which means it’s either a design flaw or a process flaw in the original manufacturing. This smacks of corporate cost cutting again. Boeing are totally on the hook for this and it’s only lucky there were no lives lost. You watch, they’ll blame it on the airline initially but the fault will come back round to them again.