• Tygr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been “striking” for a long time now, against junk TV in general. There’s an occasional awesome show that delivers but 95% of it is low-effort junk TV like dating, survival, cooking and other shows like it.

    I haven’t had live TV in years and it’s quite shocking to see what the average user deals with. Junk TV + ads that play 30% of the time is absolutely insane.

    • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      low-effort junk TV like dating, survival, cooking and other shows like it.

      … in other words, exactly the shows that don’t use actors or writers

    • blivet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I haven’t had live TV in years and it’s quite shocking to see what the average user deals with. Junk TV + ads that play 30% of the time is absolutely insane.

      Yeah, I’ve had the same experience. We don’t have live TV, and when we occasionally hang out with friends or family who do I’m always flabbergasted at the frequency and length of ad breaks nowadays, and similarly amazed that despite a nearly endless list of channels there never seems to be anything I actively want to watch.

      • timetraveller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I had one of them first TiVos, then upgraded to them expanded versions modes online for 1TB of shows. The 30-second skip button pressed six(6) times would effectively (skip) the ads. Never looked back. When I see or hear a commercial at someone’s house it rocks me like I’m in a different dimension and time.

        • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Personally I rarely watch TV in real time, so the only time of year I ever really see commercials is during the NFL season.

  • Millie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s it going to take to actually do something about these ultra-rich leeches literally destroying our planet and everything good on it to inflate a number in a bank somewhere? How do we actually build up the initiative to stop it?

    All our other problems seem largely centered around our inability to appropriately respond to extreme greed. Not only in actually actively stopping it, but in even identifying it or being able to properly censure it in the first place. The moment you start talking about the rich being the cause of our problems, there’s a section of society that starts tuning you out. I definitely feel like as things get worse people are starting to catch on, but even once we’re there, where do we go?

    If we actually get to the point of agreeing that excessive wealth is inherently misanthropic and should be a crime in and of itself, how do we make it a crime while so much power sits in the hands of those who’d be on the losing end of that decision?

    I hope the WGA and SAG can spark a change in people’s consciousness around labor. I’d honestly love to see a lot more interviews and independent podcasts coming from the picket lines. If there’s anyone who can convince Americans to fight for the value of their labor, it’s the people write and play the parts in the stories they love.

    • SwallowsDick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The fact that most people will reflexively reject and wilt at the idea of a wealth cap, or at least enforceablely taxing every dollar made above a certain amount at 99%, is a testament to the many decades of often-subtle propaganda that makes people think that modern western capitalism is the only way. As well as the continuing de-funding of public education and making colleges less accessible.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I want to add on some quick math. Some people will look at this and scoff, saying that actors are millionaires and are more similar to these billionaire leeches than to us. A billion isn’t a number you can easily wrap your head around – I have trouble putting it into the correct perspective and scale, and I’m an engineer. It’s really difficult. So to try and show exactly how much money we’re talking here, I’m going to use time:

      • 35k seconds, 9.7 hours
      • 70k seconds, 19.4 hours
      • 100k seconds, 1.16 days
      • 250k seconds, 2.9 days
      • 1m seconds, 11.6 days
      • 10m seconds, 115.7 days
      • 100m seconds, 3.2 years
      • 1b seconds, 31.7 years

      I haven’t even lived for 1 billion seconds yet, and I’m 28! Even an actor who’s racked up $100m over a successful career is closer to $0 than they are to $1b. Now arguably I’d say $100m is at the point where it needs to be treated similarly to $1b, but even so. The average working adult is closer to an actor in terms of wealth than these disgusting hoarders.

      In reality, every dollar isn’t equal, and what this analysis doesn’t take into account is the amount leftover after all necessities are paid for, which is the reason why someone making $35k is not living like a millionaire. The point here is, a billion is incredibly big. It’s unfathomable. Unless the person protesting is a billionaire, they’re on your side against the leeches and absurdly wealthy.

      (I suspect this is why actors tend liberal and billionaires tend conservative.)

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The moment you start talking about the rich being the cause of our problems, there’s a section of society that starts tuning you out.

      That’s because this is an insane claim.

      If we actually get to the point of agreeing that excessive wealth is inherently misanthropic and should be a crime in and of itself

      This is a massive “If.” I could probably never be convinced that one person’s wealth is inherently detrimental to someone else’s well-being.

      These are very extreme views. I support the Hollywood strike, my buddy is a union leader (as were both my parents), and I’m a reliably Democrat voter, and I couldn’t disagree more with what you’ve said above.

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s because this is an insane claim.

        Consider that they have the power to massively improve everyone’s lives but are choosing not to.

        Perhaps they didn’t personally cause and create some of those problems, but they are still the only ones with the power to make the necessary changes, so the continuation of those problems is indeed their doing.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          In what way does the logistics revolution spurred by Amazon’s growth not massively benefit every person who buys anything in the US? You’re seriously suggesting with a straight face, that Microsoft hasn’t saved literally hundreds of millions of lives just in database tech alone?

          You’re talking out of your ass here man. Hell, you’re putting billionaires on par with running a government which is simply absurd.

          It’s not on rich people to save the fucking world, though Bill Gates has personally done more for the world than most governments ever have. It’s on voters to pass policies that provide them better lives. That’s the point of democracy

          • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Are you serious lmao

            You think billionaires have no influence on government? Please

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think you don’t understand how government functions in any real way at all

  • Smacks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Whole lot of the bigger establishments have been going through the ringer lately

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fuck hollywood.

    This would be good opportunity for people to start new film studios and such, founded on more equal profit sharing. Let greedy pieces of shit shrivel and die without labor to exploit. There is no negotiating with those kinds of people as they will just try to find ways to force and manipulate people to do what they want.

  • EmperorHenry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m glad more and more workers are realizing the power they have over the industries they’re working in.

    Without the workers, the businesses have nothing. We really need to have a serious revolution before they replace all jobs with AI robots.

  • Sigilos@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Oh no! Anyway…

    Edit: In case the subtlety slipped by some folks, I was pointing out how very unimportant the film industry is as a whole. I stand by the folks striking for better conditions and pay, but without Hollywood the world will continue on. Humanity doesn’t need a new Marvel movie to survive the next year. Food, water, construction, transportation, these things are critical infrastructure. But I do not care if Hollywood stops making cookie cutter movies for a while, let the studios feel the crunch. Who can honestly say they are totally caught up on all the shows they want to watch, anyway? Go watch something you didn’t have time for before, because the newest season of “Someone else’s life” just aired. Go make a new friend, read a new book, or explore a new place. Don’t want to or can’t for some reason? Ok, go watch anything else, there is more media then you consume in a lifetime available for you to peruse on the internet.

    • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      To add; this is, in my opinion a bigger deal than UPS. There are other freight companies. It’s bigger than the railroads. We have other shipping. We only have one Hollywood. Entertainment sucked the last time they striked. It started all the reality shows.

  • ThinlySlicedGlizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t care how fast AI can pump out “high quality content” because I refuse to consume any of it. I really hope the strikes are successful.

    • DreamButt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      honestly we need legislation that protects artists who use their art as a means to live

      • dudebro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        No we don’t. They can do something else.

        It’s called the free market, baby.

        Blue collar workers have been finding new ways to make money ever since the industrial revolution. Don’t be a Luddite.

        If these people still want to make art, nobody is stopping them. They just have to get a real job too, like everyone else.

        It’s okay. I think they can survive and still lead a higher quality of life than the vast majority of people on the planet.

        • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          They just have to get a real job too, like everyone else.

          Would you mind expanding on what a “real” vs “fake” job is? I disagree with the premise entirely but i am not taking you with a loaded question, i am honestly curious about what that means to you (and by extension what other people who use that term might mean)

          • dudebro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Jobs that are necessary for the survival of our species.

            Jobs that people don’t do for fun. They do it because it needs to get done.

            People will still act even if they don’t get paid for it. Will they, deliver food just for the fun of it? No, I didn’t think so.

    • TheCraiggers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      because I refuse to consume any of it

      I guarantee you already have and didn’t notice.

      There’s a philosophical argument to be made for sure, and I’d probably even agree with you. But the reality is that the technology is here, and it’ll be used in pursuit of the almighty buck.

      • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s what makes it especially insidious. We want entertainment made by people, for people, not by AIs for corporations and their pockets.

        • kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m fine with AI content. It’s going to make making media so much easier for people who aren’t inherently artistic but have a vision they want to show.

    • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If it is high quality, why do you care how it was produced?

      But it’s not the high quality content that’s threatened by AI, it’s the mediocre gargabe. It’s the endless stream of poor quality TV shows and movies which are produced not as art, but as a means of steady predictibile income for the companies involved. That’s the industry aspect of the business. This side of the business consumes most of the talent in the industry. They all know it’s not good and they all hope they will get the funding to actually work on the things they know will be high quality. I think AI will allow them to do that.

      Further more, this strike is not just about AI. I think this aspect is the one media outlets care most about and gets reported on more. The entertainment industry has suffered a major shift with streaming platforms and the movement of money from production studios to streaming platforms has left the employees behind. They’re getting less money from streaming platforms but still do the same work. That’s what the strike is about. The industry didn’t care for them when it changed.

      • Loom In Essence@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m looking for an interaction with the artists. I do not care what an AI produces… and I don’t care what a marketing team or boardroom of producers produces. I’m looking for an artist’s vision.

        • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m looking for an interaction with the artists.

          How exactly are you interacting with them while sitting on your couch looking at a screen?

          This is an appeal to purity argument. You’ve invented some higher standard (that doesn’t really even make sense) with the purpose of excluding the thing you don’t like.

            • kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That it’s an entirely subjective experience and to presume that someone’s enjoyment of it means that a human had to be involved in It’s creation is such a ridiculous response.

              Have you ever seen the paintings that one chimpanzee made? They’re actually pretty nice in composition. Am I allowed to like the way they look even if no human made them?

              • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                So long as it’s not a glorified machine learning program designed to commit mass fraud and copyright infringement, then yes. Until then, go cry harder.

          • Loom In Essence@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The audience responds en masse by tuning in, paying up, being changed, perpetuating the ideas back into the culture through the filter of their own personality, chatting about the thing, praising or criticizing the artist.

            This is an appeal to purity argument. You’ve invented some higher standard

            Nope. It has absolutely nothing to do with “purity.” It has to do with humans doing the ancient human thing of making art. Dancing, singing, telling stories. You’re bringing in the abstraction of purity.

            Hollywood (in its crudest aspect) is already an AI algorithm for churning out trash. That’s why I tune out already. Because it is not humans telling each other stories. It is pure corporate manipulation. More AI in the hands of producer-goons just means more corporate manipulation and less humans telling each other stories.

            AI in the hands of an artist is a tool for exploring and creating. AI in the hands of corporate goons is the total opposite.

  • Open@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is $25,000 per annum a living wage LA? To think that these are getting so little is nuts.

    • vimdiesel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You wanna get really mad? A new practice they were trying to pull off was bring in some young good looking actors; do 3d body scans, record a bunch of voice data, and then have them allow the studios a perpetual license to use their likeness for a few thousand bucks. How evil is that?

      • lohrun@fediverse.boo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s only a matter of time for desperate people to sell their likeness to a company doing that. If there was a company out there saying they’d pay you $3k to do a full body 3d scan, record 1 hour of voice lines, and own the rights to your image…do you know how many people would do that? (Probably a significant amount)

        Evil and awful yes, but people are desperate for cash in this economy and most people wouldn’t truly understand what they are giving up to the company

        • vlad@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          At this point they should just pay OpenAI to AI generate their “actors”

  • recursivesive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    While I agree that the compensation has been way too low for the working class, I fucking hate how this is used as an excuse when it hits certain group. “what are we waiting for?” as if the real working class (employees of supermarkets, fast food chains, gas stations, etc) haven’t being fucked in the ass for a long time. But now it “hurts me, let’s have solidarity”. No sympathy for them. Eat shit.

    • rustyfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What a shit take. Seriously, how is this bad for others? Trying to delegitimise these peoples work shows me you have no idea what you talking about. Do you understand what a class war is?

      You know what? I refuse to believe someone can be this dense. I took the bait, my bad. Troll.

  • Pokethat@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I honestly don’t know how I feel. Most content feels like ‘consume our product/content and give us monthly fee’ instead of nice shows and movies. Everything seems to have a point where it pulls me out and I find myself questioning if I’m crazy or if everything feels like shit.

    There are some amazing gems, but for years it feels like Hollywood has cared less and less about making cool and engaging media and are instead of focusing on manipulating people.

    I’m sure the problem is coming from the top, but writers and actors have been pretty shit too

    • dudebro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Everything is shit. Quality is down and prices are up.

      People gladly have been lowering their standards for years so those profiting off of them can make even more money.

      Most actors are awful these days. Like, look at Chris Pratt lmao. That guy is terrible but very popular among children and manchildren.

      We don’t have this generations’ Tom Hanks yet.

      The only way to watch live action stuff that isn’t kiddie-bullshit is to watch things in other languages. They still have integrity and aren’t just loading their actors up on cocaine to cover up bad acting.

      • Dogs_cant_look_up@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is probably the worst take I’ve ever heard. It’s actually amazing how much i disagree with almost everything you’ve written here.

        And, Tom Hanks is still acting, Tom Hanks is literally this generations Tom Hanks.

        There’s so much excellent acting and directing in the world at the moment i just can’t fathom how you have come to your conclusions.

        • dudebro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m sorry, we’re just going to have to agree to disagree.

          Hope you like the new marvel movie coming out.

          • FatCrab@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, only marvel movies come out now. Everything else is actually banned at the moment. Christ, your takes are fucking awful.