• crusa187@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    Fuck Israel for refusing to stop slaughtering Palestinian civilians and forcing this escalation.

    And especially fuck the US for claiming for a year now to be working tirelessly towards a ceasefire, yet sending 10s of billions of money and bombs to Israel as a reward for the continued slaughter.

    Disgusting land grabbers.

  • NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Iran’s IRGC say attack on Israel response to killing of Nasrallah

    Iran’s Fars news agency is reporting that Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said the missile attack under way on Israel is in response to the killing of Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah last week as well as that of the Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh earlier this year.

    “In response to the martyrdom of Ismail Haniyeh, Hassan Nasrallah and (IRGC Guards commander) Nilforoshan, we targeted the heart of the occupied territories,” the IRGC said in a statement.

    So seems like Iran intends this to be a one and done response for everything Israel has done the last few months.

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      So seems like Iran intends this to be a one and done response for everything Israel has done the last few months.

      i.e. “Please don’t escalate this any further. We prefer this level of escalation and no more.”

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, that’s been Iran’s position for a while. They don’t strike first, but they’ll return fire.

        They do arm plenty of proxy groups, though.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          32
          ·
          1 month ago

          … Yeah. Iran “doesn’t strike first”. They just back terrorist groups with funding, supplies, and planning so that they can strike instead.

          Please do yourself a favor and actually educate yourself on the clusterfuck that is the middle east rather than just parroting whatever a twitch streamer tells you. This has been going in cycles for decades.

          • NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            There is a significant difference between proxies and a direct missile attack launched by a nation-state. Just as there is a significant difference between the US arming a genocidal state, and the US actually dropping bombs directly on civilians. Not to say Iran and the US are not blameless for the actions of their proxies, but there are degrees here that are significant. You kneejerk “Iran bad, Israel good” view of the world is devoid of nuance. Maybe you should get yourself a twitch stream.

            • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              23
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Where did I ever say

              “Iran bad, Israel good”

              But hey, much easier to attack a strawman, right?

              • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 month ago

                Believe it or not, but you don’t have to explicitly state something for you to be doing something. It’s extremely obvious that you approached this news with that bias.

                • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  12
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  A bias of… state sponsored terrorism bad and escalation bad? Or is the problem that I have cared about the dead civilians in the region for more than a year?

                  REALLY curious what you “sense” from that sentence.

            • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Well. The current conflict with Israel only really goes back about 80-ish years. And there are strong arguments that the current iranian proxy wars are a different conflict with different root causes but… yeah.

              The region itself? Most of that goes back to when The West decided to redraw borders with no real logic other than guaranteeing cyclic wars of ethnic cleansing between warlord. I want to say that is more 150-ish years, but I genuinely forget. So it very well could be centuries in that regard.

              But the way to think of it? The former is why EVERYONE hates Israel. The latter is why nobody is actually interested in helping the Palestinians and just view them as a way to bleed IDF resources and give the government rope to hang themselves with.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                I would say the current cycle of violence can be said to have begun after WWI and the defeat of the Ottoman Empire. But there have been plenty more cycles of sectarian and tribal violence in the region over the centuries.

                • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Yes. There are millenia of conflicts. There are millenia of conflicts around the globe. You get two groups of humans next to each other and they are going to start stabbing each other.

                  But it was normal (apologies for the negative connotations) tribal warfare. Different regions would fight other regions as both skirmishes and conquest. But it was largely when Westerners decided to draw up a bunch of maps with no willingness to understand the residents that we began the current cycles of horror. Because lets say you hate the Reds and the Reds hate you. But now? Now you live in a city with one Red and the rest of the Reds live in a city with one You. Eventually someone decides to do some ethnic cleansing which leads to retaliatory ethnic cleansing and more wars and so forth.

                  And, inevitably, warlords see an opportunity to gain power. Which leads to refugees which leads to ethnic cleansing which leads to…

            • Blackmist@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Bit of it, yeah. But Iran in particular is a mid-20th century clusterfuck of British and US interference.

              Honestly the best thing we can all do is wean ourselves off oil so it can go back to being a scattering of unimportant desert tribes.

    • NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      The Washington Post is reporting, citing three anonymous Pentagon officials, that American troops in the Middle East were not targeted during the Iranian missile attack in Israel.

      Iraqi group linked to Iran have previously fired rockets at military bases housing US soldiers in Iraq and Syria.

      Another sign that Iran is trying to respond, as a deterrent, rather than with an intent to escalate. At least that’s what it seems like so far.

      • NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Israeli military spokesperson Daniel Hagari just held a televised address.

        In it, he said the Israeli military is “fully prepared to defend and retaliate” to the Iranian attack, stressing that it would be in a “timely manner”.

        Hmm…

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      So seems like Iran intends this to be a one and done response for everything Israel has done the last few months.

      I think it’s highly unlikely that Israel will agree on that one. This may escalate and quickly.

  • Machinist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    How bad is this? Like WWIII bad or localized slaughter and ‘limited’ actions bad?

    • farcaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 month ago

      My guess is it depends on the damage this attack will cause. If the missiles are all shot down or hit desert, it will be some punitive F-35 strike on an Iranian airfield somewhere. But if there’s significant damage and casualties it could escalate.

      I don’t think Iran is going to risk all out war with Israel and the US. I suspect they expect most of their missiles (like the drones) to be shot down. Perhaps that’s wishful thinking though…

    • NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Depends on Israels response. When Iran did this in April in retaliation for Israel bombing an Iranean embassy, Iran was like “we have retaliated and are good now”, Israel responded but it was limited, and status quo was restored.

      If Israel decides to escalate (which is their default play lately), or if Iranean missiles hit forcing them to retaliate, there could be all out war, including involving the US.

      If you want a hint of what’s to come:

      The far-right Israeli finance minister (Bezalel Smotrich) writes on social media: “Like Gaza, Hezbollah and the state of Lebanon, Iran will regret the moment.”

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Well the last time Iran fired stuff at Israel, the missles were all intercepted and didn’t do anything. So we’ll see. It may end up being another otherwise nothing burger, but considering Israel is actively invading Lebanon right now, the chances for larger and larger exchanges that begin overwhelming the Iron Dome are growing by the second.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Let’s just say a limited attack by Iran would be exactly what Netanjahu could wish for, to keep the war going and secure more support from the US. So this could be the start of another 30 year war in the middle east that draws in US ground troops at some point.

    • Liam Mayfair@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t see how the Middle East war could escalate into a worldwide conflict. Ukraine, maybe. The Middle East conflict spiralling out of that territory? Nah.

      Russia are not that bothered about Iran, and the US want to keep Israel around for the geopolitical influence they get from them, but I don’t think Israel is worth enough to the US to make them risk a direct confrontation with Russia.

      Worst case scenario, Israel and Iran beat the shit out of each other while everyone else watches from the sidelines, making the occasional, half-hearted demand for a ceasefire. At most, Russia and US will continue supplying their respective friends with bombs and arms to profit off the conflict for as long as they can.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        The middle east only spirals to a world war if other countries start their own shit hoping that the existing conflict is too distracting. The US putting boots on the ground in the middle east is a great chance for China to start shit in Taiwan or south Korea.

        The saving grace is there aren’t that many countries that can escalate anything global besides the US and China. Russia seems fully occupied in Ukraine, and Europe is still a joke for military power currently.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Zionism has been an ongoing catastrophe for at least 75 years.

      These missiles will be shot down but used as an excuse for further genocide, theft, etc.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Localized slaughter and limited intervention. Same as it has been for literally decades at this point.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      BBC: “celebratory gunfire” in Beiruit.

      What a fucked up part of the world.

      Edit: the celebratory part isn’t fucked up. The doing it by shooting guns in the air is.

      • Sundial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        I mean I get where you’re coming from but you can’t honestly expect the people of Lebanon to be sympathetic to the Israeli’s given the events of the past 2 weeks.

        • twinnie@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 month ago

          Hezbollah have had this coming, they fired rockets at Israel on October 8th. So not because of what Israel was doing to the Palestinians, but in support of what Hamas did on October 7th.

          • Dkarma@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            You understand October 7 was hamas response to Israeli settlers continually invading and stealing Gaza land, right?

            This did not “begin” October 7th.
            Israeli settler terrorists are just as bad as hezbollah.

          • Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            The moment the first news dropped on October 7 it was clear Israel was to retaliate with a bloodbath and they started bombing Gaza the same evening. If Hezbollahs goal at the time was to make use of the situation, they would have went for an all out attack while IDF was in disarray.

            The goal was to increase the pressure on Israel for reaching a cease-fire agreement through keeping their northern settlers out of their settlements, rendering the region economically inactive and the settlers angry at their government.

            It seems like no one anticipated this to go into a yearlong war. Initially Hamas seemed to have aimed to reach a ceasefire quickly through a hostage exchange deal, but Israel put genocide over having their hostages return alive.

          • Sundial@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            Hezbollah has stated that they fired those rockets in solidarity with the Palestinian people.

            Source

  • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    What do they expect? That their tyranny and outright terrorism go unanswered. I guess they really think they are doing the right thing but I no longer care about isreal at all. What I don’t like seeing is violence against Jews in other parts of the world as well as violence against Palestinians anywhere in world.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    USA: we need to help defend Israel to prevent all-out west in the Middle East.

    Netanyahu: CHARGE!

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    BBC: No reports of damage or casualties so far. Missile attacks were on both Tel Aviv and Jerusalem.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    The BBC shows video of missiles over Tel Aviv, but at this point 'll wait for confirmation from literally anyone else before I believe the IDF’s claim that they’re from Iran.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    If your imperial news is based on “israeli military says”, then it’s time to find a better source.