• jaxiiruff@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This checks out after what they recently did to the ZLUDA project. As an owner of an AMD gpu I agree that ROCM support is really bad. It works half of the time and fairly poorly.

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Even worse on Linux. Even worse on more exotic distros like Bazzite where I still can’t get koboldcpp to run, which was already kind of a hassle on my previous distro.

      • jaxiiruff@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah I hear ya. How do you happen to be running it? I use NixOS and its a challenge there for me but I found atleast some success using docker since the dependencies are so out of control for AI at the moment.

        Also give Ollama-rocm + Open Webgui a shot as an alternative to koboldcpp if you cant get atleast some text generation to work because that is the only thing I have got working with rocm.

        • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          At the moment I just don’t. I got kobolcpp to run through distrobox / boxbuddy but I can’t get it to compile with rocm, so I can only use CPU generation, which is abysmally slow. Might go back to NovelAI when they release their new model if I can’t find a solution.

          • Russ@bitforged.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            What card do you use? I have a 6700XT and getting anything with ROCM running for me requires that I pass the HSA_OVERRIDE_GFX_VERSION=10.3.0 environmental variable to the related process, otherwise it just refuses to run properly. I wonder if it might be something similar for you too?

            • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              6650 XT. Honestly no idea. When I run make LLAMA_HIPBLAS=1 GPU_TARGETS=gfx1032 -j$(nproc) in the Fedora distrobox on kobolcpp it throws a bunch of

              fatal error: 'hip/hip_fp16.h' file not found
                 36 | #include <hip/hip_fp16.h>
              

              errors and koboldcpp does not give an option to use Vulkan.

              • Russ@bitforged.space
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Ah, strange. I don’t suppose you specifically need a Fedora container? If not, I’ve been using this Ubuntu based distrobox container recipe for anything that requires ROCM and it has worked flawless for me.

                If that still doesn’t work (I haven’t actually tried out kobolcpp yet), and you’re willing to try something other than kobolcpp, then I’d recommend the text-generation-webui project which supports a wide array of model types, including the GGUF types that Kobolcpp utilizes. Then if you really want to get deep into it, you can even pair it with SillyTavern (it is purely a frontend for a bunch of different LLM backends, text-generation-webui is one of the supported ones)!

                • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I don’t think so, it’s just what I’m more familiar with and I usually try to avoid apt’s PPA hell as much as I can. But maybe I should try some others, as I couldn’t get Mullvad to run either yet. :/

                  Text gen web ui I tried quite a while before I went to koboldcpp on my previous distro and I could not get that to run without crashing whenever I tried to generate anything. Sillytavern is my standard frontend that I use, so any text gen software should inherently compatible with that anyway.

          • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago
            • AMD’s Data Center revenue surged 115% YoY in Q2 2024, driven by Instinct MI300 AI accelerators and EPYC processors, leading to raised revenue guidance and a BUY rating.
            • Client segment revenue grew 49% YoY, fueled by strong Ryzen processor demand and Zen 5 sales, prompting an increased revenue forecast for 2024 and 2025.
            • Gaming segment revenue fell 59% YoY due to weak console demand, resulting in a lowered revenue forecast for this segment through 2025.
            • AMD’s acquisitions of Silo AI and ZT Systems aim to strengthen its AI and data center market position, enhancing long-term growth prospects.

            Did you even read it?

            Down 6% YTD and a market cap of 1/12 of their only competitor isn’t “doing great.”

            Firstly, Nvidia isn’t AMD’s only competitor. There’s Intel, Qualcomm, and a litany of other companies that compete with Xilinx, who AMD purchased.

            Secondly, only looking at the stock price and treating that as gospel shouldn’t be how you’re assessing whether a company is doing well or not.

            GameStop stock exploded, it wasn’t because they were doing well. Nvidia became the most valuable company on earth by market cap - do you really think they’re that valuable, more than Microsoft or Apple, or is it a bubble? Tesla stock went crazy because Elon kept chatting nonsense about how all their cars would be driverless by 2018. Etc. shit, go back enough, tulip stocks were worth more than all of the textiles industry if you only care about market cap.

            The stock market is not rational. Don’t judge the health of a company purely based on their stock price.

            • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Did you even read it?

              Well, it’s accountwalled so no.

              Additionally, holy shit my dude. Nice work being Exhibit 1A as to why retail investors and common folk shouldn’t be allowed to speak about the stock market, corporate valuation, or business finances generally.

              • andyburke@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Can’t take an L and reevaluate or something? Why this response to a pretty reasonable rebuttal of your surface take?

              • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                The irony of saying that when you think the be-all and end-all of how good a business is doing is looking at its stock price this year.

                If only it were that simple.