Credit to Chris Williamson for coming up with this though. I just found it worth sharing.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    3 days ago

    We got the meteoric rise of Obama, the Arab Spring, and Occupy Wall Street from the democratization of information.

    It was devastating to the old guard. But then they realized they could use the same tools we’d used to spread information to spread disinformation. Then when people called them on their bullshit, the regular propaganda stopped being the goal.

    No longer was the purpose to make us believe what they had to say. It was too make us not believe anything at all. They flooded the world with so much bullshit that nothing seems true anymore, and in the confusion they’re openly enacting fascist policies while pretending the news is fake.

    • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      HyperNormalisation is a 2016 BBC documentary by British filmmaker Adam Curtis. It argues that following the global economic crises of the 1970s, governments, financiers and technological utopians gave up on trying to shape the complex “real world” and instead established a simpler “fake world” for the benefit of multi-national corporations that is kept stable by neoliberal governments.

      [HyperNormalization] describes paradoxes of Soviet life during the 1970s and 1980s. He says everyone in the Soviet Union knew the system was failing, but no one could imagine any alternative to the status quo, and politicians and citizens alike were resigned to maintaining the pretense of a functioning society. Over time, the mass delusion became a self-fulfilling prophecy, with everyone accepting it as the new norm rather than pretend, an effect Yurchak termed hypernormalisation.

      -Wikipedia

  • NineMileTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    3 days ago

    The internet has the right amount of information if you can just moderate yourself. But I’m also the kind of guy that goes out for a beer or two and arrives home with no clothes on.

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’ve come up with a set of rules that describe our reactions to technologies:

    1. Anything that is in the world when you’re born is normal and ordinary and is just a natural part of the way the world works.
    2. Anything that’s invented between when you’re fifteen and thirty-five is new and exciting and revolutionary and you can probably get a career in it.
    3. Anything invented after you’re thirty-five is against the natural order of things.

    - Douglas Adams

    • TwanHE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yes you’ll cope better with technology you grew up with, but technology is also an exponential cure. For about 5500 years a guy on a horse was the fastest messaging system, then we went from beeps through a cable to video calls within 200 years.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 days ago

    Do we need like a philosophical thoughts community? Shower thoughts to me are more like “if you have a PhD all meetings you go to are doctors meetings.”

    Meanwhile, on Lemmy its like “The undulating nature of the universe can be predetermined based on a set of twelve isotopic values.”

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        I keep wanting to make a post in shower thoughts asking how the hell other people remember they need shampoo, but by the time I leave the shower I forget both the shampoo and the post.

        I got shampoo today, because my husband remembered, and I therefore suddenly remembered the post, though I no longer need it.

    • Free_Opinions@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Seems like the kind of post I’d expect your average showerthought-enjoyer to not mind seeing on their feed.

      EDIT: I’m up for philosophical thoughts community though

  • kryptonidas@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 days ago

    Governments used to want to control the narrative, now they’ll spill out so many narratives that people are overloaded on trying to figure out what is actually true. This has been going into overdrive with machine learning improvements and it’s probably just picking up traction.

    • LifeOfChance@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is the exact reason using Google to look anything up anymore is insanely more difficult if you don’t have the skills to parse through all the different waves of information. No matter what side of the argument you’re on Google will guide you into being “right”

    • spacesatan@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I recently found out I’m about as old as Java and I still haven’t decided if that sounds worse for me or for Java.

          • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Oh, I’m way older than that. I was born 2 weeks after yhe whole earth died, because the russians almost atomic bombed us on a false alarm. Until one man refused to sign off on the bombing of America.

            Which, based on that description, doesn’t ACTUALLY narrow down the decade. Which is kind of scary that the earth almost ended…more than once…from the same thing. I mean it was twice that it happened, in two different decades, but still though…maybe atomic weapons are a bad idea in the hands of russia…

  • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    I personally think that moment was in 1993, when the Encarta CD was released.

    It had a huge amount of information, but it didn’t feel overwhelming.

    The internet also didn’t feel overwhelming.

    In 2005, I think the internet already felt overwhelming.

    But I guess if you weren’t the nerdy type crawling the web, then social media and smartphones were the game changer and I would put the date closer to 2010.

    • metaStatic@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      absolutely, the Iphone was the game changer.

      the internet is as useful as it’s ever been it just stopped being a physical place you go, the computer, to something you carry with you everywhere as another layer of reality.

      • lnxtx (xe/xem/xyr)@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Before iPhones we had much useful BlackBerries, Nokia with advanced Symbian, some Windows CE/Mobile devices. Even feature phones had something called WAP, but it was f…ing expensive.

        Who needs a stylus?
        Bring back full QWERY keyboards.

    • denkrishna@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Words are made up and we actively change and redefine them when we use them based on context.

      I get the sense that you were trying to correct the OP, but really OP is just defining “information” the way you’re defining “data”

      The concept being conveyed is the same.

      We had very little of it, and had to put in a ton if effort to seek it out, but now it’s thrown in our faces nearly all the time with the litteral flick of a finger. Neither of these situations seem optimal, but whatever the optimal situation is, we must have experienced it at some point because the transition didnt happen instantaneously

      • GladiusB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think the way it’s used has drastically changed. When someone had a lot of information on hand you would go to the “smart guy/girl” and things would be assessed on a somewhat scientific level. That is unless you are picking the smartest person in the trailer park. But I digress.

        Now everyone “thinks” they are smart because they have the information. It’s how that smart person filtered through the information and interpreted the information that made them smart.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    More like, there was a brief window when the growth of the accessibility of information outpaced the growth of our ability to abuse it.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    You can turn it off, at least.

    I don’t use FB, Twitter, TikTok, etc. I use federated social media but federated social media is moderated, has no algorithm, and no ads, so it’s a very different experience.