• ghostBones@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Climate change” is obsolete, now it’s “climate crisis”. I suppose after that it’s climate collapse and then climate desolation.

      • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d say climate apocalypse and climate societal collapse are the same thing. Apocalypse doesn’t mean extinction, otherwise how would we have a post-apocalyptic world?

  • Yuumi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yippie! I love global warming!!! Thank you big corporations you are so cool!

  • Lodespawn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Interesting that despite it still being summer and roasty toasty in the southern hemisphere in January, the world average temp is still lower than the northern hemisphere summer.

    • fiat_lux@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The southern hemisphere has a lot more water surface area, which has a larger heat capacity, is somewhat reflective, and a lower density / conductivity.

      This is why Australians and Brazilians are known to be amphibious during summer.

      • Lodespawn@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah that was my thought, turns out the land water ratio in the northern hemisphere is 2:3 while it’s 1:4 in the southern hemisphere

    • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Averages mean almost nothing. They can’t really be used to say anything meaningful.

      1000 men vs 1000 women: 999 men earn $1 per hour. 1 man earns $1,000,000 per hour. 1,000 women earn $500 per hour. On average, men earn $1000 per hour, but women earn on average half that.

      The reality is obviously very different to the average.

      • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        This would only be a relevant criticism if our temperatures had a swing like 1-$1,000,000 does.

        The reality is obviously very different than you suspected.

        • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, the point remains the same. The point is averages by design remove peaks and lows by averaging them out. A system as complex as our atmosphere needs to be considered more granularly than just as by averages. Peaks and lows cause massive disasters, like in Europe right now.

    • krzyz@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      As far as I know that’s mostly because there’s much more land in the Northern Hemisphere and the temperature differences (day/night but also summer/winter) are much more pronounced over the land than over the sea: the land heats and cools faster.

  • cmoney@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So even if climate change isn’t real (which obviously it is.) What’s the down side? We invest in renewable energy, not pollute as much. Oh the horror!

    • cerevant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because the people who made money investing in the old way stop making money. That’s it. That’s the entire problem. The fossil fuels industry wants to keep making money, and the politicians who are bribed by them want to keep getting bribes. So they create a culture war so the facts don’t matter.

      • Bezerker03@lemmy.bezzie.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not THAT simple. For a period of time, there is a slight reduction in quality of life as people switch to renewables. Example, in many towns there are mandatory solar requirements on new homes, which inflates the cost of construction for homeowners etc. Same with the no gas hookup requirements now in some cities where you can’ get a gas line to your house… which means higher costs to run your heat etc.

        It’s one of those short term problems but it impacts people in a real way and people just don’t wanna go for that.

      • ShortShiftingT@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d add that especially in developed countries, we have gotten used to the high energy-density of fossil fuels, which is the result of millions of years of pressure, temperature or in short: energy. And we are using up this energy within two centuries. This resulted in the unsustainable lifestyle (it’s everywhere we look), that would have to be curbed, if we were to get off this Jurassic Park Experiment completely.

        Therefore a number of people see their very (unsustainable) way of life in jeopardy. This source of resistance is what gives that culture war BS its fuel in the first place. At least in my experience of talking with people it is this negative emotional place that leads them to embrace false information in order to keep their lifestyles. Which in turn makes cooperation impossible. To make it even worse, people in developing countries now aspire to the same lifestyle - and who can blame them? But I don’t trust their (or ours for that matter) politics enough to hope for scientifically sound action to get there.

      • Delusional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which is just blatantly straight up evil. They are evil people destroying people’s lives for profit. And everyone is just hunky-dory with it.

        • BigNote@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve said for years that the deniers and fossil fuel barons will be looked upon by future generations as some of history’s greatest villains. They will be seen in much the same light as a Hitler or Stalin or Mao.

  • Razgriz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I’m not mistaken, before recording temps earth started as a molten volcano ridden planet billions of years ago, no?

    Compared to that this is just a slightly warmer ice age. We good.

    Checkmate Thunbergers!

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the conservatives don’t disagree that climate change is real, they disagree that humans are responsible. To them it’s things like El Niño or solar activity.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And they’re wrong according to virtually every person who actually studies the climate for a living, so they might as well pretend it’s made up.

      And it’s stupid anyway. You might be able to deny human-caused climate change, but you can’t deny smog and pollution. Greener energy sources mean less smog and pollution. Why isn’t that a good thing to them?

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a fundamental lack of understanding of math and science.

        There’s a video going around conservative circles talking about how CO2 only makes up .04 percent of the atmosphere, and therefore even if it were doubled it would be less than 1/1000th of the atmosphere, so it’s not worth worrying about.

        I tried to explain to my father that that’s exactly why we’re able to have such an impact. They don’t understand that we’re able to make a much larger relative impact on CO2 versus Nitrogen and Oxygen and therefore a larger impact on global temperatures.

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s actually a spectrum of disavowal of responsibility:

      • It’s not happening.
      • Even if it is happening, it’s not our fault.
      • Even if it is our fault, there is nothing we can do.
      • Even if there is something we can do, it’s too late to do anything.

      It’s just that the first stage (denialism) is starting to become untenable.

      • Syd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago
        • Even if it isn’t too late to do something it’s the others that should do it
        • Even if we are the ones that should do something, it’s down to everyone individually so no job for the politicians
        • Even if it is down to the state, sorry it’s too expensive.
        • acargitz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          THANK YOU! I was trying to remember where my brain dug this up from and I couldn’t pinpoint it.

          • Bernard Woolley : What if the Prime Minister insists we help them?
          • Sir Humphrey Appleby : Then we follow the four-stage strategy.
          • Bernard Woolley : What’s that?
          • Sir Richard Wharton : Standard Foreign Office response in a time of crisis.
          • Sir Richard Wharton : In stage one we say nothing is going to happen.
          • Sir Humphrey Appleby : Stage two, we say something may be about to happen, but we should do nothing about it.
          • Sir Richard Wharton : In stage three, we say that maybe we should do something about it, but there’s nothing we can do.
          • Sir Humphrey Appleby : Stage four, we say maybe there was something we could have done, but it’s too late now.

          https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0751831/characters/nm0001329

      • loutr@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Symptoms of climate change are getting harder and harder to ignore. The goalposts are moving slowly, not towards any kind of constructive action mind you. Soon they’ll get to “Of course it’s man-made, but there’s nothing we can do”.

        • NABDad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          My dad switched from saying it isn’t real to saying he’ll be dead soon so he won’t have to experience it.

          Jokes on him: it’s happening faster than he thought. He’s getting to experience it anyway.

          • atx_aquarian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            First person that uses that argument with me, I’m going to tell them, in no uncertain terms, to stop voting since the same argument applies.

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            My dad switched from saying it isn’t real to saying he’ll be dead soon so he won’t have to experience it.

            Ask him if he cares about the world that his kids and grand-kids will have to live in, or is he just a selfish asshole.

            • NABDad@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I did ask that, and it took the conversation to a bizarre place.

              When I asked if he cared what happened to his kids or grandkids, he asked if I believed in God.

              I said no, and asked what that had to do with anything. He said, if I believed in God, I’d go to heaven.

              So, that’s his suggestion: suffer through a miserable, doomed existence, and then go to heaven when you die.

              Things that I found interesting from that:

              1. He pretends to be a Christian, but he is filled with hate and just wants to pick fights with everyone. I think he doesn’t actually know anything about what being Christian is, other than if you’re not, you burn in hell for all eternity.

              2. My mom, whose beliefs generally align fairly closely with his, does not want to cause trouble, unlike him. So, while he immediately tries to start shit, she’ll avoid topics that will result in argument. She will certainly avoid asking questions if she doesn’t want to hear the answer. So, she visibly cringed when he asked if I believed in God, because she knew what was coming next.

              Lots of teenagers dramatically accuse their parents of being fascists, but in my case, he’s the real thing. He’s not quite a Nazi, but if they came to power in the U.S. he’d be goose-stepping along with them. He idolizes Nazi Germany, but pretty much considers modern Nazis to be pathetic losers.

              In the strange, twisted world of child/parent relationships, I’m stuck. I know what he is, but he’s also my father. I’m twisted up. I know he loves me, and I love him, but I hate what he is if that makes any sense.

              My wife and my kids can’t stand him, but everything I have and most of what they have comes from him. He knows that I disagree with him about almost everything he cares about, but if I go to him for help, he’ll help without question and without strings attached.

              He wasn’t always this bad. He had been better for years, but then as he has declined physically and can’t pretend he’s young anymore, he became more miserable, and I think he wants everyone else to be miserable too.