they will save 188,000 € on Microsoft license fees per year

  • TheLastOfHisName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 days ago

    It would be nice to see the European governments start a genuine effort on funding open source development, and start laying the foundation for a migration to their own Linux distro. Microsoft isn’t trustworthy. Hell, most American big tech is untrustworthy. Moving your government offices to an in house developed OS is going to be paramount for their security in the future.

  • kolorafa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    ambitious plan

    Good, good, but I guess it is only a plan to negotiate for lower prices.

    But if they actually deliver without going back… 😍

  • BoycottPro@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I sometimes wonder what if everyone who spends money on licensing fees instead takes the same amount of money and puts it into FOSS. Imagine what we could achieve? Likely the money would be used more efficiently because they could donate it to non-profit companies which don’t need to pay tax.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Just remember, the license fees mostly don’t go into development, or maintenance, or security, or any of that, they mostly pay for “sales” which includes a strong component of end customer support. When you divert “all that money” into FOSS, FOSS development and maintenance might be lucky to get 20%, the other 80% will be spend training and employing tech support.

      • BoycottPro@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        There are companies which offer training and support to FOSS. Companies could also pay those companies.

        • MangoCats@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yes, RedHat has been doing this for decades.

          Thing is: RedHat probably can’t price match M$ in a bidding war, probably not even close.

    • raldone01@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      And there could be insight into whether the money is actually used for developing the relevant application.

  • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    3 days ago

    Germany has done this multiple times before. Microsoft has historically swept in with some sweetheart deal to lure them back.

    Hopefully it sticks this time.

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Hard to catch fish if you see the fish as dumb idiots, for some reason the fish don’t seem to respond well to it idk.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        The German IT fish keep coming back for the bait - never bothering to avoid the hook.

  • Wolf@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m more surprised that a city in Germany didn’t switch to Linux a decade or more ago.

    Late to the party is still showing up, good for them.

    • Dr. Unabart@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Too busy faxing each other. Germany is Luddite Land, by choice.

      Source: moved here 7 years ago. Germans are a weird bunch. Change is not welcome in just about any form.

      Nice to see them adopt the open source apps, though. They can probably get some screaming deals on some US Robotics 56k modems on eBay Local.

      🤪😘

  • RaptorBenn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    Holy fuck, that’s the clearest sign for war prepararion ive seen from Europe yet, they don’t want the US in their computers.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I have seen this happen before, for a while, then somehow M$ convinced them to switch back.

        • osugi_sakae@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, I think this happens somewhere in Germany every few years. MS then makes a concerted effort to woo some politicians back, and a few years later we have news that a city or state is moving back to MS. Yes, it is good that cities / states are trying Linux and challenging MS, but there is soo much more to any of this than technical superiority or licensing fees.

          • MangoCats@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            188K dollars or euros, is basically the cost to put one warm sales body in the territory, to keep the hooks in acknowledging that they should be paid for their software.

            To me, it’s about digital sovereignty, and the states should stand on their own two feet and know how their own computers work, not just rely on a foreign company.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Don’t worry. They’ll get a big discount on licenses and swap right back again.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        At that scale it starts to be about the cost of support, and if M$ will hold their hands for the installation, configuration and maintenance, at some point that costs the state more to provide for Linux than the M$ licenses… Of course, when they lean so heavily on M$ for keeping their systems running, the temptation for abuse becomes strong…

        If I were “head of state” I would insist on development of homegrown talent to at least maintain the systems, hopefully configure and even build them too, not as a matter of money, but as a matter of security, independence, etc. I would try to pull back before reaching the point of developing locally used systems that aren’t used elsewhere, that’s not good long term, but if you develop the local talent to run the things, and they naturally build some of their own things, encourage that to be shared with the larger world in addition to leveraging the best shared (locally vetted, secure) tools from elsewhere.

      • RaptorBenn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I dunno, free’s still a lot cheaper, once it’s setup, it’ll be so much more flexible, it’ll hardly be worth going back.

            • Blackmist@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              When it’s just you, on your own PC, and you don’t value your time, it’s free.

              Just from the license fees here, we’re talking what, roughly 2000 employees?

              At that scale, you’re going to be paying for support. Whether through a third party, or employing enough people to fix all the things that can go wrong. And not everyone in IT knows enough about Linux to fix broken boxes.

              I once recommended Linux for our customer servers, to be installed hundreds of miles away. And what I found was that employees who knew Linux (and specifically how to fix it when it fucks up) were more expensive than the trained monkeys we sent out to fix things, who at least knew how to copy data off it and reinstall Windows/slap a new drive in it, and that issues were my fault for recommending it. It was also easier to talk customers through some settings in Windows if it falls off the network somehow, than it was to deal with getting them to type things into a command line.

              And that’s before you even consider servers and where your stuff all goes. With MS it goes into “the cloud”, and you don’t need to worry too much about anything other than paying for it. With your own hardware, you very much need to worry because if you don’t, then one day it won’t be there any more.

    • Bonna Shejve@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      very interesting observation… I came to conclusion if USA withdraw from NATO - EU and Great Britain will not send military troops to Poland in case russian invasion

        • Bonna Shejve@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Absolutely not. Open source software shift means not just installing Linux on your pc but also rejecting social media which now are instrument of manipulation and lie. It is clearly seen how social media channels (mentioned above) quickly remove posts that contradicts major ‘PARTY LINE’. I see it ALL the time. ‘Know the truth and truth makes you free’. Slavery starts when people live in lie.

            • Bonna Shejve@europe.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              A good question. I cannot tell you which distro is the best but I am definitely voting for Linux (I think less popular distro is better). A few years back almost all Ukrainian banking system collapsed because of russian virus Petya, only banks that were using Linux were OK… And bad for russia - only small banks were damaged… So it is how we survived) > So what’s the right distro to prepare for a Russian invasion?

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    241
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Fingers crossed that this will be an indisputable success. 🤞
    Allegedly a similar project in Munich went really really well, but was shut down when the right wing came into power.
    For some reason the right wing of Munich doesn’t like freedom. 🙄

  • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    3 days ago

    Microsoft blocking email access to the ICJ director may be the best thing to happen for Linux adoption since the SteamDeck. Now every Microsoft lobbyst can be asked what would happen is the US government order Microsoft to block them out of their infrastructure.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      3 days ago

      This and software companies openly supporting Linux. For example, if Adobe and AutoCAD among others would build some tars then you could see it.

      Ironically, Game Engines are ahead of the curve on this. You could build Unreal Engine from the github page on Linux for many years now and we also have Godot and Blender. I think several PCB design and also architecture tools already exist on Linux as well, so there is definitely room for a lot of industries and businesses to shift away from Windows as long as they can find a competent tech guy to maintain everything with minimal downtime.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 days ago

        Blender got ported to Linux in 1998, to Windows in 1999. The modal interface and key command language is no accident, it literally is a 3d vi.

        Linux is generally strong when it comes to 3d graphics workstations, it inherited IRIX’ market share, plenty of artists around, especially in the film industry, who’d go on a strike if you took away dragging windows with alt+LMB. Graphics, that is, CAD is dominated by Windows as CAD started out as 2d sketch software which ran on cheap DOS machines.

        Houdini is also Unix-native and Blender’s only surviving competitor (considered by features, not industry inertia), Maya started out as cross-platform IRIX+Windows.

  • RealM__@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    I admire the plan, but I doubt the public sector is going to completely acclimate to Linux. The average age of an employee in the public sector is something like 40+.

    You might get lucky and get them to use one new program like LibreOffice, but there’s no way you’re going to completely revamp every desktop PC to Linux. I work in this field, and while everyone has been nice and friendly, they (and the entire system around them) are also hugely resistant to digital change. If they ever make the move to a Linux Desktop environment, the IT support will go through hell.

    • Wrrzag@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      Eh, I don’t know. I’ve worked developing software for the administration and their computer use is just the applications (web or native) they had built to perform their tasks. The OS is very irrelevant to them, some orgs even had shortcuts to these native programs put in their intranet, back in the days of java applets.

    • Obelix@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 days ago

      I know what you are saying, but it is not so bad: First of all, most things people are doing at work is not really related to the OS underneath. So if you are responsible for creating passports, you are using the special government program for passport creation. If you are a policeman, you are using the special police software to do your policework. Yeah, you need additional training, but in the best case your usual software keeps working. Most people are not really interacting with the OS during their work day.

      (and let’s be honest: Microsofts totally insane UI changes are also requiring lots of training. If you are used to just click on some specific buttons that somebody told you to click on, you’re totally lost in Microsofts crazy wonderland of ridiculous UI changes )

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 days ago

        Plus government computers are always old as shit so Linux should install nice and easy, give em mint for that windows like UI.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Cross platform app development has been a viable and very available choice for 20+ years now.

        Organizations which are developing their specialty applications locked in to a specific OS… get what they deserve.

      • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Look im an IT guy, and enforcing 2FA for all accounts at our company directly caused at least 2 people to quit at my company.

        People are enormously resistant to change. It doesn’t even matter if it actually impacts their job or anything, they will freak out and complain.

        Hell 2 weeks ago I added a 3rd AP to one of our offices and just the act of moving the APs around caused enough of a disturbance that HR heard about it. And that was me giving them better internet! There wasn’t even any downtime! I just moved the things that sit on the ceiling and nobody notices!

        • MangoCats@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          enforcing 2FA for all accounts at our company directly caused at least 2 people to quit at my company.

          Thereby measurably improving the workforce.

          I just moved the things that sit on the ceiling and nobody notices!

          Somebody noticed.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      the IT support will go through hell.

      I thought IT support was already in perpetual hell?

      For the last 10+ years “the desktop” has been over 90% the browser, and the Chrome, Firefox, Edge user experiences are pretty similar to start with. Chrome on Linux vs Chrome on Windows is virtually indistinguishable.

      I gave my wife a Dell laptop new from the factory with Ubuntu on it about 3 years ago. The printer support in Windows was already bad, and yes it’s a bit worse in Linux, otherwise she just complains less and has fewer screaming fits of frustration.

    • doktormerlin@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      There used to be skins for KDE that made it look and feel 1:1 like Windows XP, I don’t know if these things still exist. If yes, there you have it: Just make the system behave like Windows and they won’t notice a difference. They only have to use Office, Mail and print files anyways. Most other tools they use are browser-based and will feel the same way

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The names have changed. I literally had that conversation with “an engineer” 20 years ago wherein he concluded “I don’t know, if I have to learn new names for most of the programs I use (Word, Photoshop, maybe two others) I don’t think I want to use that other OS.” I had to support his position, if you can’t retrain to click on “Libre Office Writer” instead of “Office Word”, then a move to Linux isn’t for you.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Except most people just click a link on their desktop that goes to a thing they have a completely different name for anyways. If you don’t tell them anything (or just say it’s a new version of Windows) they likely won’t notice the actual differences, just complain about missing a specific icon for something without being able to correctly name what it is

            • doktormerlin@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yet they are fine with using Windows 11, which looks completely different to Windows 7 or XP. They complained in the beginning just as much but then they were fine with it. People get used to change, they just hate it in the beginning.

    • Ironfist79@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I also work for the state and it’s pretty discouraging how MS has us by the balls on everything. Every application we use is written in VB.net or Visual C# which also depend on running on a Windows server. Switching to Linux would be a nightmare and cost millions for no real gain. Maybe we could run SQL Server on Linux but I’m sure that even that has some gotchas that the state would not want to deal with.

    • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Some localities in Germany have been incorporating Linux into their systems for 20+ years.

      That may explain why the financial benefits seem low.

          • exchange12rocks@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            50 cents per user per month doesn’t make any sense: I think for MS it might be cheaper to give products for free than to process these payments

            Note that that number (180000) is per year, not per month

            • MangoCats@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’m guessing it’s a really small state with not much IT going on.

              As for cheaper to give for free: ABSOLUTELY. But, with free then they don’t have their sales guys in there talking with them, they don’t have the state “acknowledging the debt” and the legitimacy of their right to charge for their software.

              In the 1990s M$ let the world pirate DOS and Windows with wild abandon, they were just happy that people were using their stuff and not others’. After the world was good and hooked, shortly after we all survived Y2K, they started turning the screws - requiring license keys for full functionality, getting serious about demanding payment.

              Bill Gates net worth was “only” $30B before they got serious about charging for their software, today I see it’s over $200B even after all of Melinda’s philanthropy.

              • exchange12rocks@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                I’m guessing it’s a really small state with not much IT going on.

                A small organization will have higher software license prices per user than a large one.

                • MangoCats@feddit.it
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Also true, and at this kind of rate we can assume the state is doing most of its own IT self-support without a lot of M$ hand-holding.

            • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Maybe you responded to the wrong person? I didn’t talk about price but yeah M365 is paid monthly. Mostly, you can get annual licenses with a bit of a discount.

              But an exchange online license is only $4/month ;)

              • exchange12rocks@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Mate, are you sure you don’t confuse per year and per month numbers? Those 180000 is per YEAR (for 30000 users)

                • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Mate, are you sure you didnt confuse my comment with someone else’s? I didn’t put any numbers in my comment at all, I was just being cheeky and pointing out that M365 licenses come with a Windows license as well. Or at least business basic and above.

                  I am not German, and I don’t know what licenses or how many accounts the German government has. That is irrelevant to my comment.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Mostly because the FOSS community doesn’t have a single point of leadership that is maniacally focused on becoming a total monopoly.

          And that’s a good thing

    • gamer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Didn’t the Trump admin suspend enforcement of foreign anti-bribery laws? Microsoft just has to write a check to the right person to kill this.

      • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Breaking anti-bribery laws of a country is illegal, no matter whether they are enforced in some other country or not. Of course Microsoft can break the law and then keep paying large fines until they decide to no longer break the law.