Basically, install Windows as you normally would, but when asked for Time and Currency format, select English (World) instead of your country.

Then let the installer do its thing. Eventually, you will see a window with an ice cream cone on the floor with the words “Something went wrong” and the error message “OOBEREGION.” This cryptic message means that the “out of box experience” (OOBE) didn’t launch because it didn’t know which region to launch.

Click Skip, though, and Windows will install just fine. You won’t be prompted to buy Microsoft 365, you won’t be prompted to pay for a OneDrive subscription, and your Start menu won’t be cluttered with apps.

  • willybe@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    After the install. Create admin and user accounts not tied to ms. Use the user account normally, and when you need admin you enter the second account details.

    Use Sophia script to clean up all the advert apps bundled with win11.

    I wish I could find a script to remove the advert features from edge for when I have to office. Mozilla Firefox is your day to day browser.

    Use chocolatey.org to install ur apps. When you do updates, one command can do it all.

    Check start-up scripts, and ensure there is nothing that doesn’t need to be there. Teams no, zoom also no.

    • eee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      165
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      “The only downside is that the Windows Store appears not to work out of the box.”

      This is a feature, not a bug.

        • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If you’re gonna buy into the Microsoft ecosystem with a subscription service and a Microsoft Account, you’ll be stuck with their trash. Should maybe consider what else might “break Gamepass” in the future (purely by accident of course).

          Like how if you don’t want OneDrive, whoops, now your Office documents can’t autosave. Better put OneDrive back like a good consumer and here’s some ads about increasing storage, you’re welcome.

    • Engywuck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      Article’s author didn’t fully catch the meaning of “downside”.

    • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m of the opinion that MS will eventually get this right, but it won’t be called Windows 11 by the time it does. The redesign, efforts into command-line and WSL, they are moving in a positive direction, but the ads, bloat, spyware, needs to go. If they can release Win12 or whatever its called with the simplicity of Win11, have the features of Win10 (and finally put a nail in the old interfaces from XP and before), they could have another solid performer like Windows 7.

      • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        they are moving in a positive direction, but the ads, bloat, spyware, needs to go

        They’re going nowhere. It’s making money, Microsoft is using that income to offset development cost instead of just selling the OS at a flat reasonable rate. It’s part of the Windows business model now.

        Windows is entrenched, they own most of the business world, they will never face serious kickback for their design decisions. Not at this point. Not until Gen Z gets old enough and numerous enough to start pushing workplaces to adopt Apple, and that’s an even worse direction.

        This isn’t ever going to change. The only thing they’ll do is give tools to Enterprise editions for businesses to control the install, and only via Azure, at a price point far too high for the average user. Anything less than Enterprise will be locked down and monetized to hell and back.

        Effectively, if you’re not a business, you will not have true control over Windows. Users no longer get to be admins. You have to pay for that privilege.

        • rastilin@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re not offsetting anything, they still charge money for the boxed copy sold in stores. This is pure profit for them.

        • sadreality@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah windows 11 is laying ground work for all of this.

          It seems like they have decided that plebs and OEMs paying licenses was not a good business model.

          Really makes you wonder where the entire business world is heading. It seems every company starting to prefer this route.

        • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not until Gen Z gets old enough and numerous enough to start pushing workplaces to adopt Apple, and that’s an even worse direction.

          I am a bit weirded out by such an association. Around me, I do see a few people with Apple tech, but they’re a minority. How would people that are able to afford these products be numerous enough to matter?

        • whynotzoidberg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not until Gen Z gets old enough and numerous enough to start pushing workplaces to adopt Apple, and that’s an even worse direction.

          Elder millennial here. This was said of us, too. I remember main framers sometimes noting this direction and poking fun.

          Yet here I am and the world keeps chugging along in similar ways.

        • RachelRodent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know why gen z is being portrayed as tech illiterate everywhere on lemmy. We grew up with technology and half of us are adults already

          • PawjamaParty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Growing up with technology doesn’t automatically grant you knowledge of it. Kids that grow up with iPads are capable of using iPads, but sit them in front of a computer and they’ll be lost. Being technically literate is more than just being able to install an app from the app store.

            • RachelRodent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Technically true yes but that is not going to be that way for everyone gen z are also people who are capable of learning. I personally am a tech and privacy nerd and know that not everyone of my generation is as interested but I am also sick off people branding gen z as dumb children on here, hell most of us are adults already.

              • PawjamaParty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Of course everybody can learn, but is anyone teaching them? I’m a millennial, I grew up with computers, but I had to learn a lot of things the hard way because it was just expected that we’d somehow become experts without anyone teaching us. We weren’t told about cybersecurity, or how to troubleshoot issues, I had to learn all those things by myself. And learning to troubleshoot and other more technical things I only learned because I’m actually interested in computers. Many of my peers aren’t, and so don’t know even the most basic things.

      • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        the ads, bloat, spyware, needs to go

        They just introduced them. What makes you think this isn’t an integral part of the future of Windows?

      • rastilin@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think they’ll go even harder, making Windows only run stuff purchased through the Windows Store so they can completely lock in the market.

      • fiah@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        (and finally put a nail in the old interfaces from XP and before)

        that’s probably not going to happen because it will break some programs

    • Toribor@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Now that I can get the Windows Terminal and WSL without the Microsoft Store it seems like this is yet another bonus.

    • Boldizzle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It also talks about just setting your region again after the install to get the windows store working again. Most of the other bloat still stays away though.

  • legion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    How has it been like 20 years since Slashdot was relevant, and we’re still getting the same, “LOL install Linux instead” comments?

    Like, I’ve been using and loving Linux since the late '90. But damn, I’m expecting to see “Micro$oft” in these comments any moment.

    • Kogasa@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Slashdot or not, Microsoft sucks. The underlying truth of the “meme” will keep it alive forever.

    • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lmao I’m surprised I don’t see Micro$oft anymore, was literally just thinking about that the other day for some reason.

    • Boldizzle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Reminds me of the PC Master Race people that comment on Console related posts. Like, cool we get that you’re insecure about your platform of choice, we don’t need to be reminded.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It will be fixed pretty quickly

      You’re better off removing everything from power shell since you’ll be in there to install apps anyway

  • nostradiel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would rather go for Linux but when Windows needed I’d go for LTSB/LTSC version, choose this oobe during install, after install run christitustech debloat script, activate through github script and in register turn off auto download/install updates. 1.4GB ram idle usage while having all you need.

    • havokdj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      1.4 GB ram idle usage

      That is still comically high. Arch Linux with DWM gets 100 mb, I’ve seen gentoo builds with DWM get as low as 40 mb.

      KDE looks better than windows and it gets a third of the ram idle usage at most.

        • havokdj@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Unless you don’t have a lot of ram and don’t want to spill over into swap?

          Aside from that, why would you say that? So if it idled at 8 GB of ram (which it is on its way to eventually doing) would you still say that?

          Do you have any idea how ridiculous of a concept it is that a clean operating system alone idles alone on 4gb of ram? What in the hell are the services doing that would make it idle that high? The bloat stacks too you know, if the code that is used to run services in an operating system is inefficient, it will get proportionally worse the more services and programs you open up.

          • Kogasa@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Unless you don’t have a lot of ram and don’t want to spill over into swap?

            That has nothing to do with idle RAM. If you are swapping while idle, you have HORRIBLY fucked up. RAM usage is (and should be) determined by memory pressure. When idling, there should be none.

            Aside from that, why would you say that? So if it idled at 8 GB of ram (which it is on its way to eventually doing) would you still say that?

            Yes. Idle RAM usage means nothing. You need to measure how much it contributes to memory pressure.

            Do you have any idea how ridiculous of a concept it is that a clean operating system alone idles alone on 4gb of ram?

            No.

            What in the hell are the services doing that would make it idle that high?

            Preloading and caching in otherwise wasted space.

            • havokdj@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Memory pressure? You mean niceness?

              Niceness just gives a program a higher CPU (and thus, RAM) priority.

              Your system is still going to swap. The idling ram doesn’t magically go away. That’s how it works. If it didn’t, you start experiencing bugs, crashes, and data loss, because there is no more room in the pool.

              Just because a computer is “idle” doesn’t mean it isn’t doing anything, it is still performing work to stay on, composite your window manager, display it, run services in the background. Those services are still programs that are often vital to the operating system actually functioning, you can’t just make that utilization magically disappear because you need more RAM because they tend to have lower niceness values than programs in userspace, even Windows understands that.

              Yes, if you are swapping at idle then you indeed did do something horribly wrong, it is a bit comical that you don’t realize that proves my point. The explorer.exe devs indeed did something horribly wrong, they released shitty half baked code because managers think more code = harder/better work when it is actually the reverse.

        • nostradiel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly. Every time before I found out about LTSB and these scripts my idle usage wasn’t lower than 3-3.6gb. I went through all those running processes and said myself that there has to be better way. (And boy how I was pissed off when I found out about the telemetry…) It led me to Linux, but sometimes I need to use Windows so I have dual-boot with LTSB.

        • havokdj@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not really. I can see why you’d think that but you just compile a kernel that supports what you need. A kernel customized for your hardware can be less than half the size of the default kernel, it’s just that it may function ONLY on that hardware.

            • havokdj@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re missing the point here. That is to save at best 60 mb. Arch with KDE still maxes out at like 500 mb of usage.

    • caustictrap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I exactly do this. It switches every services to manual and turn off so many notification bloat. After doing this windows never bothers me. Every app , games, hardware like capture card just works on windows.

      But i use linux on my laptop because linux is good for browsing and wordprocessing.

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      but when Windows needed

      the irony is that the only reason ever for “Windows needed” is because some obnoxious asshole decided they want to force others to use Windows. There’s literally nothing that Windows can do better. There is only a quasi monopoly and probably bribes to companies to release no builds for other platforms (e.g. for games).

      • Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        ive heard this for years and i always laugh, “there is nothing windows does that linux doesn’t!” yeah, totally man.

          • Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Sure, games. Proton/wine came a long ways but it’s far from perfect or has the same depth of software as native windows. Also potentially having to mess with lutris can be annoying. Graphics drivers are also better on windows too. If you’d like to try to argue this just look at protondb. Is it a 100% compatible with every title? No? Hmmm… Not to mention proton triggering some games anti cheats.

            It’s also why there are several memes including the one posted just yesterday or the day before about “cheating” on Linux with windows for gaming. Plus the whole standard advice ive seen on Lemmy being “Linux for daily driving, windows partition for gaming.” Now again, why would that be the standard advice? https://lemmy.world/post/5834366

            ^—thread in question where Linux gamers commiserate their difficulties getting certain games to run on their Linux systems.

            Linux is fine, windows is okay if you disable the telemetry, just use what ever os and software you want but it’s really silly to make false claims.

            • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure, games.

              That’s not something Windows can do better. That’s developers targeting a release only for Windows. Which is exactly the point I made in my original comment that you responded to. Games that have a native release (and even wine, sometimes) typically run faster on a Linux machine than on Windows, because there’s less OS garbage overhead.

              Graphics drivers are also better on windows too.

              The only graphics drivers that are “better” are those for new cards when the manufacturer - again - targeted the windows platform.

              The whole philosophy of device drivers is unfathomably better on Linux, because it works with chipset drivers and doesn’t give a shit about which vendor a specific chipset came from, as long as the API is compatible. Also, almost everything that’s not brand new hardware works out of the box on a vanilla install of e.g. debian (and definitely Linux Mint) whereas on Windows have fun installing drivers that come with tons of crapware.

              As you said yourself: it’s silly to make false claims. Just because some hardware vendors choose to build hardware for which they tailor drivers to windows, that’s not a virtue or merit of windows, that’s an abuse of monopoly if anything.

              A vendor could also release a new graphics card with an internal electronic black box, release a linux driver and then say “haha, look, Windows can’t support that”. Except that with Linux, at some point, someone will decode the interface and get a working driver in a release somewhere.

              • Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You can make up all the reasons you want, the end result is the same. People use windows because the product works better and more reliably. If you want to split hairs be my guest but every metric windows wins against Linux in gaming. It has a higher user base, more software, better support, and as you said even entire businesses developing stuff for it because businesses go where the customers are. Sure you can say “oh they just greased some palms”, but if you knew anything about the gaming world that doesn’t mean jack shit if your games and hardware sucks. The graveyard of failed hardware and software prove that. As much as I love steam and I’m glad the steam deck is having success every other Linux based hardware attempt they’ve come up with has failed hard like their console and steam link. And what’s your point about some games running better? Some games run worse too, beyond the fact your statement admits not every game runs better, how does that make Linux superior? Your example about companies also doesn’t disprove anything because a company can do that…but hasn’t in the entire 40+ years of Linux existence…curious isn’t it? Also you can program driver’s for windows too for devices lol, how else do you think people tinker with stuff? I mean I’m using a PS3 eye as a webcam on my Windows PC rn with custom community made drivers just like Linux does …

  • the_q@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Download Rufus.

    Download Pop! OS

    Create USB installer.

    Install Pop! OS

    There you go.

    • 13617@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      insert specific versions of missing dependencies here for whatever program you try to run

      • the_q@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean sure I guess? I don’t know what you’re running where that happens a lot, but everything I have on my system has been as easy or easier to install as Windows.

        Joking and snark aside, Linux can be as difficult or as easy to use as you want it to be.

          • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Installing Steam on Windows: Microsoft has a store but it sucks, I don’t think Steam is even in there, so you have to open up your browser and remember that the URL is steampowered.com or maybe valvesoftware.com, or google it, somehow make visually sure you’ve found the right webpage and that you’re not being scammed, find the download page, click Download, now it downloads a small installer .exe to your Downloads folder, open up your file manager, go to you Downloads folder, find the .exe that just came down, click that, there’s a several step process that asks you several questions that amount to “do you want to install this in a non-standard place that will break shit later?” then it downloads and installs the actual app.

            Installing Steam on Linux (I’m using Mint Cinnamon here, but the process is pretty similar for most popular distros): Open the software manager, type “steam” in the search box, click on the first result to come up, click install, key in your password, it downloads and installs the app.

            TL;DR: Everyone. Android, iOS, MacOS, every single Linux distro. Everyone. Has a functioning app store system that users actually use. Except Windows.

              • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                I pretty much outright don’t believe you. Flatpak ships by default on a lot of distros; it works on Linux Mint and is integrated with Mint’s software center. In my procedure I said “click the first option that pops up” well the Flatpak version is the second option. I do know that Manjaro requires you to go into the software manager’s settings and toggle it on, and Ubuntu deliberately doesn’t include Flatpak by default because of their competing Snap store.

                The assertion that Flatpak “does not come by default on most systems” is factually incorrect. Per this page: https://flathub.org/setup the majority of distros listed say that “Flatpak is included with newer versions by default and is ready out of the box.” With a notable exception of regular old Ubuntu, for which the command is “sudo apt install flatpak.” Or Arch or Gentoo, whose entire deal is “By default we install AS LITTLE AS POSSIBLE. Do it yourself.”

          • the_q@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Are you serious? I can install nearly any software just by typing ‘sudo apt install’ and that’s it. How is that difficult?

    • Case@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I had an issue switching away from Pop!, and it may have been a one off, but when I tried to install a different distro, and it wound up screwing up my boot partition to the point the easiest thing was just to run a live distro, pop open parted, and wipe from there before I could install a different distro.

      Mostly mentioning it because it was annoying to figure out and remedy - the remedy was annoying because I only had one flash drive so I had to wipe what I wanted to install, and just wasting time regarding that.

    • stephenc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pop!OS is becoming more and more out of date and problematic. Honestly Fedora is the only version of Linux worth using these days (there’s some gamer variant of it I can never remember that’s probably fine too).

      • Kogasa@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly, there’s a half dozen that are just as good as Fedora out of the box, and dozens that are just as capable once broken in.

        • stephenc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have yet to find a distro besides Fedora that is actually reliable and works well with everything with minimal tweaking. Ubuntu and its derivatives are horribly unstable and finicky and everything else has its own issues. Fedora just works.

          • the_q@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Dude what are you talking about? Are you running something super specialized or old, wacky hardware? Trying to use Wayland with an Nvidia GPU? I’d gladly put my Pop system up against any Fedora system and I wouldn’t have a hiccup.

            • stephenc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you would do any searching regarding Pop!OS you would see tons of posts and articles saying that it hasn’t been updated in forever and it’s not just graphics drivers and such that need updating, it’s essential OS packages. You’re running the Windows 7 of Linux distros and spouting the same arguments as they do.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The gamer variant you’re talking about is Nobara.

        Which is pretty good.

        I switched to it about a month ago, reminds me of what Ubuntu used to be with its easy to use-ness

      • the_q@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is? Hmm I’ve not had a single issue with it in years. It gets regular updates, granted it’s not on the current Ubuntu version, but out of date it is not. What problems does it have?

        Use what you want, but making the declaration that Fedora is the distro to go with is a stretch.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Wow you must really struggle with basic day to day stuff then

        What a bizarre flex lmao

        You may as well be saying I don’t know how to flush my toilet 😎

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pretty @#%^ing ironic posting this shortly before the W11 23H2 build releases and literally un-does everything all over again.

    The only answer is refusing to use Microsoft malware full stop.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you really need to use Windows for some reason–for instance, my job requires me to use software that isn’t available for Linux (or, for that matter, Mac)–what you want to look for is a long-term service channel release of Windows. They’re difficult for end users to find, but It’s more or less just the OS, and not much of anything else. Updates are security only, not features. You’ll typically need a Windows license, and then will have to buy an additional Win LTSC license on top of your existing license.

    • jsnfwlr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you really need to use Windows

      What if I want to use Windows for many reasons? I mean in cases where Linux could work, but it is a personal preference?

      I get you’re trying to help with your suggestion, but the way you started that comment isn’t needed at all - it stinks of elitism.

      You could have just said:

      Another way to get Windows without all the bloat is to install it using a Windows long-term service channel release.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This falls a little flat to me. I’ve been using desktops since the IBM 8086 clones of the 80s; I don’t recall ever seeing anyone that was passionate about Windows (or MS-DOS before that). Perhaps there were, but I don’t remember them. Microsoft products were just kind of the default after a little while; people used them because it was convenient. Plenty of people are deeply passionate about Macintosh, or whichever Linux distribution they like, but I just don’t see that in Windows. Most people seem to use it because that’s what they have to use in order to play games, or run work applications.

        But hey man, if Windows is really your jam, but you don’t like the bloat, then you go right ahead! You are more than welcome to like what you like, and it’s really not my place to tell you that you’re wrong. I use Windows 99% of the time because I’ve got, uh, fuck, 35 years (?!?) of experience using Microsoft products, and the documentation for Tails is really, really spotty. (OMG, I just realized that I went to college the first time using DOS 6.22; I didn’t even have Windows 3.1.)

        • jsnfwlr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can have a preference without being passionate or evangelical about the thing you prefer.

          I feel an operating system is a really weird thing to be passionate about anyway. And judging others for their personal preference in OS says more about the person doing the judging if you ask me…

          I find merit in each of the major operating systems I use: Windows 11, Mac OS 13, Ubuntu, Debian, Manjaro, Raspbian/Raspberry Pi OS, and Alpine Linux - and those are just the ones I run currently. In the past I used OpenBSD, FreeBSD, Solaris, HPUX, Slackware, SUSE, Fedora, Redhat, Windows 3.11/95/98Se/2000/XP/7/10, and Mac OS 9 through 12 (with the exception of Cheetah and Mavericks).

          But to act like you’re better than someone else, and make it clear you think less of them, because of your choice in operating system is telling. As mentioned else where ITT it’s like the console vs PC master race crap you get in gaming communities - it says more about the insecurity of the person trying to elevate themselves than anything else.

  • spudwart@spudwart.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    The cleanest windows 11 install topped off with formatting the drive and installing Linux.

  • Gazumi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Microsoft is a “New Oil” drilling company. Expect the Enron like approach